From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:39:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAPcayjhedNWaL20rsaUQbxXFdEXAF8aqwd9YX5gLVbOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621239831-5870-2-git-send-email-beata.michalska@arm.com>
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 10:24, Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Introducing new, complementary to SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY, sched_domain
> topology flag, to distinguish between shed_domains where any CPU
> capacity asymmetry is detected (SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) and ones where
> a full range of CPU capacities is visible to all domain members
> (SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL).
I'm not sure about what you want to detect:
Is it a sched_domain level with a full range of cpu capacity, i.e.
with at least 1 min capacity and 1 max capacity ?
or do you want to get at least 1 cpu of each capacity ?
>
> With the distinction between full and partial CPU capacity asymmetry,
> brought in by the newly introduced flag, the scope of the original
> SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag gets shifted, still maintaining the existing
> behaviour when one is detected on a given sched domain, allowing
> misfit migrations within sched domains that do not observe full range
> of CPU capacities but still do have members with different capacity
> values. It loses though it's meaning when it comes to the lowest CPU
> asymmetry sched_domain level per-cpu pointer, which is to be now
> denoted by SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h b/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
> index 34b21e9..57bde66 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,16 @@ SD_FLAG(SD_WAKE_AFFINE, SDF_SHARED_CHILD)
> SD_FLAG(SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY, SDF_SHARED_PARENT | SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
>
> /*
> + * Domain members have different CPU capacities spanning all unique CPU
> + * capacity values.
> + *
> + * SHARED_PARENT: Set from the topmost domain down to the first domain where
> + * all available CPU capacities are visible
> + * NEEDS_GROUPS: Per-CPU capacity is asymmetric between groups.
> + */
> +SD_FLAG(SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL, SDF_SHARED_PARENT | SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS)
> +
> +/*
> * Domain members share CPU capacity (i.e. SMT)
> *
> * SHARED_CHILD: Set from the base domain up until spanned CPUs no longer share
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 8:23 [PATCH v4 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska
2021-05-17 8:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag Beata Michalska
2021-05-18 13:39 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2021-05-18 14:27 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-18 14:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-18 15:09 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-18 15:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-18 15:47 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-18 15:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-18 16:34 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-17 8:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska
2021-05-17 12:04 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-17 13:18 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-17 15:06 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-18 14:40 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-18 15:53 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-18 17:10 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-19 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-19 19:48 ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-17 8:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits Beata Michalska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKfTPtAPcayjhedNWaL20rsaUQbxXFdEXAF8aqwd9YX5gLVbOQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).