* [PATCH] Documentation: process: Fix grammar errors in management-style.rst
@ 2025-08-24 18:50 I Viswanath
2025-08-25 5:10 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: I Viswanath @ 2025-08-24 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: corbet; +Cc: workflows, linux-doc, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees, I Viswanath
Fix various grammatical errors in management-style.rst
Signed-off-by: I Viswanath <viswanathiyyappan@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/process/management-style.rst | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
index dfbc69bf49d4..4ae05a89950a 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ to do with reality. It started as a lark, but that doesn't mean that it
might not actually be true. You'll have to decide for yourself.
Btw, when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
-lead persons, not the people who do traditional management inside
-companies. If you sign purchase orders or you have any clue about the
+leads, not those who do traditional management inside
+companies. If you sign purchase orders or have any clue about the
budget of your group, you're almost certainly not a kernel manager.
These suggestions may or may not apply to you.
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ actually true.
The name of the game is to **avoid** having to make a decision. In
particular, if somebody tells you "choose (a) or (b), we really need you
to decide on this", you're in trouble as a manager. The people you
-manage had better know the details better than you, so if they come to
+manage better know the details better than you; if they come to
you for a technical decision, you're screwed. You're clearly not
-competent to make that decision for them.
+competent enough to make that decision for them.
(Corollary:if the people you manage don't know the details better than
you, you're also screwed, although for a totally different reason.
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Fix grammar errors in management-style.rst
2025-08-24 18:50 [PATCH] Documentation: process: Fix grammar errors in management-style.rst I Viswanath
@ 2025-08-25 5:10 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-25 17:17 ` viswanath
2025-08-26 0:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2025-08-25 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: I Viswanath
Cc: workflows, linux-doc, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees, I Viswanath
I Viswanath <viswanathiyyappan@gmail.com> writes:
> Fix various grammatical errors in management-style.rst
>
> Signed-off-by: I Viswanath <viswanathiyyappan@gmail.com>
Thank you for working to improve our documentation...I don't think I can
apply this patch, though.
Your signoff should include your full name, please.
But more importantly...
> ---
> Documentation/process/management-style.rst | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
> index dfbc69bf49d4..4ae05a89950a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ to do with reality. It started as a lark, but that doesn't mean that it
> might not actually be true. You'll have to decide for yourself.
>
> Btw, when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
> -lead persons, not the people who do traditional management inside
> -companies. If you sign purchase orders or you have any clue about the
> +leads, not those who do traditional management inside
> +companies. If you sign purchase orders or have any clue about the
This change is OK, but what was there was OK too
> budget of your group, you're almost certainly not a kernel manager.
> These suggestions may or may not apply to you.
>
> @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ actually true.
> The name of the game is to **avoid** having to make a decision. In
> particular, if somebody tells you "choose (a) or (b), we really need you
> to decide on this", you're in trouble as a manager. The people you
> -manage had better know the details better than you, so if they come to
> +manage better know the details better than you; if they come to
This one changes the meaning of the sentence
> you for a technical decision, you're screwed. You're clearly not
> -competent to make that decision for them.
> +competent enough to make that decision for them.
...and this one was fine as it was.
> (Corollary:if the people you manage don't know the details better than
> you, you're also screwed, although for a totally different reason.
> --
In general, this kind of playing with the wording for text that is not
actually wrong is not hugely helpful; I would encourage you to look
elsewhere for places to contribute to the documentation.
Thanks,
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Fix grammar errors in management-style.rst
2025-08-25 5:10 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2025-08-25 17:17 ` viswanath
2025-08-26 0:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: viswanath @ 2025-08-25 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet; +Cc: workflows, linux-doc, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 10:40, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> I Viswanath <viswanathiyyappan@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Fix various grammatical errors in management-style.rst
> >
> > Signed-off-by: I Viswanath <viswanathiyyappan@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for working to improve our documentation...I don't think I can
> apply this patch, though.
>
> Your signoff should include your full name, please.
>
Just to clarify --- "I Viswanath" is my legal name as it appears on my
official documents.
> But more importantly...
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/process/management-style.rst | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
> > index dfbc69bf49d4..4ae05a89950a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
> > @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ to do with reality. It started as a lark, but that doesn't mean that it
> > might not actually be true. You'll have to decide for yourself.
> >
> > Btw, when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
> > -lead persons, not the people who do traditional management inside
> > -companies. If you sign purchase orders or you have any clue about the
> > +leads, not those who do traditional management inside
> > +companies. If you sign purchase orders or have any clue about the
>
> This change is OK, but what was there was OK too
Noted
>
> > budget of your group, you're almost certainly not a kernel manager.
> > These suggestions may or may not apply to you.
> >
> > @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ actually true.
> > The name of the game is to **avoid** having to make a decision. In
> > particular, if somebody tells you "choose (a) or (b), we really need you
> > to decide on this", you're in trouble as a manager. The people you
> > -manage had better know the details better than you, so if they come to
> > +manage better know the details better than you; if they come to
>
> This one changes the meaning of the sentence
Sorry for that.
>
> > you for a technical decision, you're screwed. You're clearly not
> > -competent to make that decision for them.
> > +competent enough to make that decision for them.
>
> ...and this one was fine as it was.
>
Noted
> > (Corollary:if the people you manage don't know the details better than
> > you, you're also screwed, although for a totally different reason.
> > --
>
> In general, this kind of playing with the wording for text that is not
> actually wrong is not hugely helpful; I would encourage you to look
> elsewhere for places to contribute to the documentation.
I see. Thanks for taking your time to reply to this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
Thanks,
I Viswanath
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Fix grammar errors in management-style.rst
2025-08-25 5:10 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-25 17:17 ` viswanath
@ 2025-08-26 0:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2025-08-26 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet, I Viswanath
Cc: workflows, linux-doc, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 11:10:29PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ actually true.
> > The name of the game is to **avoid** having to make a decision. In
> > particular, if somebody tells you "choose (a) or (b), we really need you
> > to decide on this", you're in trouble as a manager. The people you
> > -manage had better know the details better than you, so if they come to
> > +manage better know the details better than you; if they come to
>
> This one changes the meaning of the sentence
I think the sentence means that people under a manager know the details
(i.e. intricacies) better than their manager himself.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-26 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-24 18:50 [PATCH] Documentation: process: Fix grammar errors in management-style.rst I Viswanath
2025-08-25 5:10 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-08-25 17:17 ` viswanath
2025-08-26 0:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).