From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD4F1BDC3; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730499524; cv=none; b=Xm88zyOtTxggdAmEmwJX6CS4MJEK87I1dc+nGZomr/0y5RMpk8Ama2M94FRLC+qyErWFfvczndiZwxPS3j52epFhdyx+F0rOTgy3yTyJHD8U2viEdCkSjeU/UoWvZKmYy2hN1uvZSfsMeV2dTLr9z30lORcYre6cIGS9aMGazs0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730499524; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SfvWv72ZbUeIjpMhK1H+Di14U2NJnni6MvQ7OWwTfDo=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Cc:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=Tgk8V7UiG9fDuH1MkAMx4AGoUCWqxpr/uJi/XTGgSN4+PBJ3hK1QAUijCdkJLiUNvADPAxT6wSMk5oN46NF+adxRBABufqz0tJWNYqph9rtdWIFZddGiLOnLy4bWtEK5yW1e6715795CnekstnYP3yw9Ii3CojTjBDm/sYQxeTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=G8B5Fbih; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="G8B5Fbih" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E707C4CECD; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:18:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730499523; bh=SfvWv72ZbUeIjpMhK1H+Di14U2NJnni6MvQ7OWwTfDo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=G8B5FbihtNvVjmiGncdZkw/5g49VXEDLWU6dCd6f7AgBZV7b3MDz4Mio9teMOIupZ ARqPuoMHB79uUnWfl+rqF4KTcZ/gObfhf3oVmSS9eCRk0qutPaqPxfYhbHSu3Vq/je HAnbzuzI/c9euOqXkGM4iUaORjvXEUct9BNxVVJk/Pbc72JYcDPtDceTthEVk9fecj /Eb+mS/2aEEzZIyWFJQYVe4M7FITlC7FUxUCj5mBCz6yf4dfV6rgbJW7pxdd+uGM6c HQnGDrwoQ/wXmcgGWjGK7qycALq7sacle8cuCNP5D38T9ddXyPOhWhHpmJw1iV1I20 ayJ6MSw0pdYXA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 00:18:39 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Thomas Gleixner" , "Ross Philipson" , , , , , , , , Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/20] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2 References: <20240913200517.3085794-1-ross.philipson@oracle.com> <87a5eivgku.ffs@tglx> <87msiitxto.ffs@tglx> In-Reply-To: <87msiitxto.ffs@tglx> On Sat Nov 2, 2024 at 12:04 AM EET, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 23:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri Nov 1, 2024 at 11:13 PM EET, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I think we can sort them out independently as long as we find a > >> conclusion how to address locality change. > > > > And to be fair: there was no reaction from anyone. It is mostly x86 > > patch set, meaning that I was waiting for some reaction first from that > > side. And I did respond to that when it came. > > The x86 side is mostly self contained, so the damage there is minimal, > but the TPM parts are changing the generic operations and the x86 parts > depend on them. > > So let's not create a chicken and egg problem and solve the TPM parts, > which at my cursory glance are partially legitimate fixes, independent > of the actual trenchboot x86 functionality. Yeah, I'm already writing a (draft/RFC) patch to demonstrate my proposal that I sent so all good. > > Thanks, > > tglx BR, Jarkko