From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta1.migadu.com (out-170.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0580640B396 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784633925; cv=none; b=HzSJm0nXzGY24b1EprXJjsRgIHwgx6REY3tSffAr5ebpIVhbtC4wro0iqlarIMe+Yh668ErY7JCd8B7qC95Z2Uji+smsHOer3TXMwVo7olbJvc7+MY/utEqp4dAOOkOnnyc0Tie23uvY7qgNhZBRC+dDhmDvg3UgUTd65lX6uRA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784633925; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zNshJn/c6IOOJ/rvSuHsDToyKKbuVeyQfFpR8m05c1k=; h=Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Disposition; b=Rfjy7CSkg/MQ5/NHO3u2UJ+1GXK0wZeoHfbzSAVjrkb2N5O5HUXy4cksVU0mkqbd/n0GiqTxteGPIYOrNnic/IzgohrXwUQ3EINr8YIF/2xQnu6xCQ+dxBFCQ2MsRvmcnsVrteW6fjHcJPtashhAPFOPAaeGBH8dkD/pSxFkvLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=XJoPdW3H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="XJoPdW3H" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1784633911; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=B6lhiI2q/qZYGGxt2f3OXZ7gIkM5jB/KE2hFDF6ccMo=; b=XJoPdW3Hc6jLvgUnVBwb9sH4DnHCmHhDs4pvW9YJs6eWqinQYRMhBte5HrQce3jqKawL9I aGCMgaI1iCstyqI82p3cjEqnCAeJsdLipXVjOeUtAFLoG3HljKiP65Ct7p9K+okQYQjPl7 wnmd5TPt4jSRBWPT+Vid6KU1NHkxpg0= Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:38:14 -0700 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: hwmon: Move LM63 family to a dedicated binding X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Troy Mitchell" To: "Troy Mitchell" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Guenter Roeck" , "Paul Walmsley" , "Palmer Dabbelt" , "Albert Ou" , "Alexandre Ghiti" , "Yixun Lan" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Shuah Khan" References: <20260721-ctl2301-v2-0-ef5fb342872a@linux.dev> <20260721-ctl2301-v2-2-ef5fb342872a@linux.dev> <20260721095822.1E9631F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260721095822.1E9631F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mutt-References: <20260721095822.1E9631F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> X-Mutt-Fcc: =Sent X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:58:20AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > [Severity: Medium] > Should the interrupts property be explicitly defined in this block? > > Because the LM63 family was moved out of trivial-devices.yaml (which > broadly permitted the interrupts property) to a dedicated schema using > unevaluatedProperties: false, device trees that correctly describe the > hardware's interrupt capability via the ALERT# pin will now incorrectly > fail dtbs_check validation. Good catch. The trivial-devices binding allowed one interrupt, and the LM63 family has an ALERT output. I will preserve that part of the existing binding contract by adding the following to the dedicated binding: interrupts: maxItems: 1 - Troy