From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84A33B42E6; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791844634; cv=none; b=EizfeDrUJwFm7dPhMeZeUMr6cD7YPYREm/6rprw3Xj7Zp0Xi3lXlL/XrxjbhGabJrwRWec2wcn/rKcQXDCLvaPWtHgadsRSa/Z6C0R7MxK8vZIj1BytWc5E7d5sIq4LWJ0wDQtJ9q5NygFNLOULuEZLcLPxyOlby6Bfe0Kc8SNQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791844634; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FdwbozunUCc7zuPRwq9GYUfaTcQ565a3OSXnMSsVAbI=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Cc:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=T6RoSINZkUs2FpPaAlaLL/qS0wOd99GAHg5Ry5VhjhU7rU853GZdffvK1O/cKDn+rjznpJNhMOK0jPZ3EyhSSddcOrCr7hFGaxz5QclINBxl4egXb2WNOiqOKhuXnYLT1tNwBF1W+Ld3SMlFtnWJcOfzHRDRurYPl4CjkCwgRqo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EhTjnUtB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EhTjnUtB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B96441F0089B; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791844633; bh=oUGbcqLCEbhdugpJCrgg19ejdVgr04nu9YdlTnXgGEQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:Cc:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=EhTjnUtBMlBY9vB+/mNO/C3HMLjZJkXGicJvnUxDon0cM+ECRf2X0M0Etl/ejTyLG CZRi+26dBISL4Njxidz63wzMsLEr8O+4piRbc7urBrXyizxvIuCC42W8yAspELTUvg /CefZYPngjm01mwZ368ZtR2y3HPKq8Hh9Sa1/3E2Uo2Xqcp0i5W6DtE5+jnnhwUyJx jMkuc6VatwUyWRODXYpRcwoP+AaKC1EAp+eCHcO4+LX3DO9WeJMaQ87tIQ7Ol/MZTj AV2zQXdFSXriGQtsBOszLcP3tSLTF4Nps3x+yB4C12EfwxptY9vywyHhLRbwAvvoQQ KzUNkh23YrHBQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:37:10 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Danilo Krummrich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: clarify return values when disabled Cc: , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Shuah Khan" , , "Johan Hovold" To: "Randy Dunlap" References: <20261008171547.3084466-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20261008171547.3084466-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> On Thu Oct 8, 2026 at 7:15 PM CEST, Randy Dunlap wrote: > @@ -820,6 +826,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_lookup_and_rem > * > * If debugfs is not enabled in the kernel, the value -%ENODEV will be > * returned. > + * If debugfs is not enabled in the kernel build, the value %-ENODEV > + * will be returned. If debugfs is enabled in the kernel build but is di= sabled > + * by using "debugfs=3Doff" on the kernel command line, the value %-EPER= M > + * will be returned. This keeps the old *and* the new text. Besides that, when debugfs is disabled via kernel command line debugfs_change_name() checks if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry)) return 0; and if disabled via kernel command line dentry would have been an ERR_PTR a= nd hence it would just return 0. (There may be more functions of this sort, I didn't check all of them.) Thanks, Danilo