From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv3 2/3] lib/vsprintf.c: make %pD print full path for file
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:40:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMd4ixry8ztzlG/e@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210611155953.3010-3-justin.he@arm.com>
On Fri 2021-06-11 23:59:52, Jia He wrote:
> We have '%pD' for printing a filename. It may not be perfect (by
> default it only prints one component.)
>
> As suggested by Linus at [1]:
> A dentry has a parent, but at the same time, a dentry really does
> inherently have "one name" (and given just the dentry pointers, you
> can't show mount-related parenthood, so in many ways the "show just
> one name" makes sense for "%pd" in ways it doesn't necessarily for
> "%pD"). But while a dentry arguably has that "one primary component",
> a _file_ is certainly not exclusively about that last component.
>
> Hence change the behavior of '%pD' to print full path of that file.
>
> Things become more complicated when spec.precision and spec.field_width
> is added in. string_truncate() is to handle the small space case for
> '%pD' precision and field_width.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wimsMqGdzik187YWLb-ru+iktb4MYbMQG1rnZ81dXYFVg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst | 5 ++-
> lib/vsprintf.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> index f063a384c7c8..95ba14dc529b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> @@ -408,12 +408,13 @@ dentry names
> ::
>
> %pd{,2,3,4}
> - %pD{,2,3,4}
> + %pD
>
> For printing dentry name; if we race with :c:func:`d_move`, the name might
> be a mix of old and new ones, but it won't oops. %pd dentry is a safer
> equivalent of %s dentry->d_name.name we used to use, %pd<n> prints ``n``
> -last components. %pD does the same thing for struct file.
> +last components. %pD prints full file path together with mount-related
> +parenthood.
>
> Passed by reference.
>
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index f0c35d9b65bf..317b65280252 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/dcache.h>
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <linux/math64.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> @@ -601,6 +602,20 @@ char *widen_string(char *buf, int n, char *end, struct printf_spec spec)
> }
>
> /* Handle string from a well known address. */
This comment is for widen_string().
string_truncate() functionality is far from obvious. It would deserve
it's own description, including description of each parammeter.
Well, do we really need it? See below.
> +static char *string_truncate(char *buf, char *end, const char *s,
> + u32 full_len, struct printf_spec spec)
> +{
> + int lim = 0;
> +
> + if (buf < end) {
> + if (spec.precision >= 0)
> + lim = strlen(s) - min_t(int, spec.precision, strlen(s));
> +
> + return widen_string(buf + full_len, full_len, end - lim, spec);
> + }
> +
> + return buf;
> +}
> static char *string_nocheck(char *buf, char *end, const char *s,
> struct printf_spec spec)
> {
> @@ -920,13 +935,37 @@ char *dentry_name(char *buf, char *end, const struct dentry *d, struct printf_sp
> }
>
> static noinline_for_stack
> -char *file_dentry_name(char *buf, char *end, const struct file *f,
> +char *file_d_path_name(char *buf, char *end, const struct file *f,
> struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
> {
> + const struct path *path;
> + char *p;
> + int prepend_len, reserved_size, dpath_len;
> +
> if (check_pointer(&buf, end, f, spec))
> return buf;
>
> - return dentry_name(buf, end, f->f_path.dentry, spec, fmt);
> + path = &f->f_path;
> + if (check_pointer(&buf, end, path, spec))
> + return buf;
> +
> + p = d_path_unsafe(path, buf, end - buf, &prepend_len);
> +
> + /* Minus 1 byte for '\0' */
> + dpath_len = end - buf - prepend_len - 1;
> +
> + reserved_size = max_t(int, dpath_len, spec.field_width);
> +
> + /* no filling space at all */
> + if (buf >= end || !buf)
> + return buf + reserved_size;
> +
> + /* small space for long name */
> + if (buf < end && prepend_len < 0)
> + return string_truncate(buf, end, p, dpath_len, spec);
We need this only because we allowed to write the path behind
spec.field_width. Do I get it right?
> +
> + /* space is enough */
> + return string_nocheck(buf, end, p, spec);
> }
It easy to get lost in all the computations, including the one
in string_truncate():
dpath_len = end - buf - prepend_len - 1;
reserved_size = max_t(int, dpath_len, spec.field_width);
and
lim = strlen(s) - min_t(int, spec.precision, strlen(s));
return widen_string(buf + full_len, full_len, end - lim, spec);
Please, add comments explaining the meaning of the variables a bit.
They should help to understand why it is done this way.
I tried another approach below. The main trick is that
max_len is limited by spec.field_width and spec.precision before calling
d_path_unsave():
if (check_pointer(&buf, end, f, spec))
return buf;
path = &f->f_path;
if (check_pointer(&buf, end, path, spec))
return buf;
max_len = end - buf;
if (spec.field_width >= 0 && spec.field_width < max_len)
max_len = spec.filed_width;
if (spec.precision >= 0 && spec.precision < max_len)
max_len = spec.precision;
p = d_path_unsafe(path, buf, max_len, &prepend_len);
/*
* The path has been printed from the end of the buffer.
* Process it like a normal string to handle "precission"
* and "width" effects. In the "worst" case, the string
* will stay as is.
*/
if (buf < end) {
buf = string_nocheck(buf, end, p, spec);
/* Return buf when output was limited or did fit in. */
if (spec.field_width >= 0 || spec.precision >= 0 ||
prepend_len >= 0) {
return buf;
}
/* Otherwise, add what was missing. Ignore tail '\0' */
return buf - prepend_len - 1;
}
/*
* Nothing has been written to the buffer. Just count the length.
* I is fixed when field_with is defined. */
if (spec.field_width >= 0)
return buf + spec.field_width;
/* Otherwise, use the length of the path. */
dpath_len = max_len - prepend_len - 1;
/* The path might still get limited by precision number. */
if (spec.precision >= 0 && spec.precision < dpath_len)
return buf + spec.precision;
return buf + dpath_len;
Note that the above code is not even compile tested. There might be
off by one mistakes. Also, it is possible that I missed something.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-11 15:59 [PATCH RFCv3 0/3] make '%pD' print full path for file Jia He
2021-06-11 15:59 ` [PATCH RFCv3 1/3] fs: introduce helper d_path_unsafe() Jia He
2021-06-11 15:59 ` [PATCH RFCv3 2/3] lib/vsprintf.c: make %pD print full path for file Jia He
2021-06-11 21:28 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-06-15 6:43 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 7:04 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-06-15 8:32 ` Justin He
2021-06-14 15:40 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2021-06-15 6:48 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 7:14 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-06-15 7:18 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 14:48 ` Justin He
2021-06-11 15:59 ` [PATCH RFCv3 3/3] lib/test_printf: add test cases for '%pD' Jia He
2021-06-11 21:40 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-06-15 7:06 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 7:15 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 7:40 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-06-14 15:44 ` Petr Mladek
2021-06-15 7:07 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 7:47 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-06-15 7:56 ` Justin He
2021-06-15 8:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMd4ixry8ztzlG/e@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox