Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: doc: Call out the non-reentrance conditions
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:40:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW+rxfMof4QcGSrq@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YW8EzNmq/bde5VTa@slm.duckdns.org>

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:47:56AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:31:17AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > +Workqueue guarantees that a work item cannot be re-entrant if the following
> > +conditions hold after a work item gets queued:
> > +
> > +        1. The work function hasn't been changed.
> > +        2. No one queues the work item to another workqueue.
> > +        3. The work item hasn't been reinitiated.
> 
> Maybe phrasing it so that the above are the conditions defining a work item
> to be the same instance would be clearer?
> 

Hmm.. that would mean queue_work_on() may change the work item to
another instance? For example:

	struct work_struct w;

	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(w, some_f);

	queue_work_on(&w, system_wq, 1); // queue a work and create
					 // an instance

	queue_work_on(&w, system_long_wq, 2); // queue the same work
					      // item but it means
					      // changing it to another
					      // instance.

Looks a little counter-intuitive to me, but let me try (combined with
Matthew's suggestion)

<in Guidelines section>

* A work item instance will not be processed by multiple workers at the
  same time, i.e. it's non-reentrant, so requeuing the same instance of
  a work item is safe and not racy.  Operations considered as changing
  the work item to a different instance are: 1) change the work
  function, 2) queue the work item to a different workqueue, or 3)
  reinitiate the work item.  The non-reentrance guarantee doesn't hold
  for different work item instances.

Regards,
Boqun

> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-20  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18  1:31 [PATCH] workqueue: doc: Call out the non-reentrance conditions Boqun Feng
2021-10-18  2:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-18  3:19   ` Boqun Feng
2021-10-18 11:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-19 17:47 ` Tejun Heo
2021-10-20  5:40   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2021-10-20 16:18     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YW+rxfMof4QcGSrq@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox