From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <guro@fb.com>, "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:00:17 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ybe0YWEo7Wp7wib9@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211205183220.818872-7-longman@redhat.com>
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 01:32:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> + In the case of an invalid partition root, a descriptive string on
> + why the partition is invalid is included within parentheses.
> +
> + Almost all possible state transitions among "member", valid
> + and invalid partition roots are allowed except from "member"
> + to invalid partition root.
So, this part still bothers me for the following two reasons that I brought
up earlier:
* When a valid partition turns invalid, now we have a reliable way of
discovering what exactly caused the transition. However, when a user now
fails to turn a member into partition, all they get is -EINVAL and there's
no way to discover why it failed and the failure conditions that -EINVAL
represents aren't simple.
* In an automated configuration scenarios, this operation mode may be
difficult to make reliable and lead to sporadic failures which can be
tricky to track down. The core problem is that whether a given operation
succeeds or not may depend on external states (CPU on/offline) which may
change asynchronously in a way that the configuring entity doesn't have
any control over.
It's true that both are existing problems with the current partition
interface and given that this is a pretty spcialized feature, this can be
okay. Michal, what are your thoughts?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-05 18:32 [PATCH v9 0/7] cgroup/cpuset: Add new cpuset partition type & empty effecitve cpus Waiman Long
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] cgroup/cpuset: Don't let child cpusets restrict parent in default hierarchy Waiman Long
2021-12-13 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-15 12:23 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-15 17:59 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-17 15:48 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Make child cpusets restrict parents on v1 hierarchy Michal Koutný
2021-12-17 16:34 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-12 21:25 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have empty cpuset.cpus.effective Waiman Long
2021-12-13 20:45 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-15 3:24 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-15 10:36 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] cgroup/cpuset: Refining features and constraints of a partition Waiman Long
2021-12-15 14:49 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-15 16:29 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-16 9:28 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition type Waiman Long
2022-01-12 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-12 15:40 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-12 21:23 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] cgroup/cpuset: Show invalid partition reason string Waiman Long
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst Waiman Long
2021-12-13 21:00 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2021-12-15 14:44 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-15 18:16 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-15 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-15 18:55 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-12 21:21 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-05 18:32 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftest/cgroup: Add cpuset v2 partition root state test Waiman Long
2021-12-09 15:39 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] cgroup/cpuset: Add new cpuset partition type & empty effecitve cpus Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ybe0YWEo7Wp7wib9@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).