From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550E0C433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244359AbiAEVMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:12:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244352AbiAEVMi (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:12:38 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CAEEC061245 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:12:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id d3so515491ilr.10 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:12:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+IvGtL/Cdr/WsdAI8BblKEPdwrJXksPcRkkKFt5itRQ=; b=ZaehH+x5c0zMI/IfYQs/P2s8KjVJpoFcoUPnh+aQ843si2v3nD3DC7aBVH2zE+H7IV XtKaomiGdT9vzvdrdiYMNczQ4NKF5buM1kOQS4NV1m8sbZ7/KvWCfG6wlcavCzgDRu3z IcI7k4fHp3NQ8f1SrS8r5KhG3fearM36RhnFmjv5QN+q4bMI8CpX03N+yOPa4NpnXfdV u7ez66TZ5917ahjPpH/7swu5B4GjVkgttA13c7TRCjugt20r8n4f0zTa9bIJ1pCFcC69 PhdYDdzGv14ETQauuHZaLzl4lRqnrBcSApmHgmYtJAwIvVNNup/UqMg0qa8XdhM6Q1XM f0hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+IvGtL/Cdr/WsdAI8BblKEPdwrJXksPcRkkKFt5itRQ=; b=mUql15iB6aUZFPK7HTJ5Y9fupa+1pNuI5933GzsJ9Fv8ECq/Wv887jcJMw5i5qN2kG PN7bYqQcEt8NtlkA6Mn7UuFWHosQAko8FJegGVx4/gn0YI/64KHzpO7177969JHQ0t1w lrtHRjbnHjSnizuwQDFeXd7+ZMAGs2tN6keU+N5vbRuNl0lzfwvDpBgx+WcSHgePIKWG ymwRZ+AGHQ7Ucc4K51lNUzgot99dGp7YlVkRqNknAzpNVWj0gaN6Ws2cgnpN+OEtzIj5 FjES0M9QBpDTySvSET6Q81UXyQ8wtPQXklmQPogi9M4l4QQAanxjQVSoS/2L2qC62TIN S61w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ROvWZeq7d7+Yn3pJxjUGgDLLdEzdCKoQB1QCCTlcz+EGKs/pR hbiUpVCw98m1P9HbTMS9hk2jjg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1baUlWmMI6qXqkj6NLFvmqM5nQ0X8KL8YRZ2jVPVCm0ebJk8cq3iWAIKjjYEoHOCd/Ir/iA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:148c:: with SMTP id n12mr27203549ilk.51.1641417157408; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:183:200:5b02:855e:267d:5b0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z16sm907465ilz.60.2022.01.05.13.12.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:12:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 14:12:33 -0700 From: Yu Zhao To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , Linux ARM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , page-reclaim@google.com, the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Multigenerational LRU Framework Message-ID: References: <20220104202227.2903605-1-yuzhao@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:43:13PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 12:30 PM Yu Zhao wrote: > > > > My goal is to get it merged asap so that users can reap the benefits > > and I can push the sequels. Please examine the data provided -- I > > think the unprecedented coverage and the magnitude of the improvements > > warrant a green light. > > I'll leave this to Andrew. I had some stylistic nits, but all the > actual complexity is in that aging and eviction, and while I looked at > the patches, I certainly couldn't make much of a judgement on them. > > The proof is in the numbers, and they look fine, but who knows what > happens when others test it. I don't see anything that looks worrisome > per se, I just see the silly small things that made me go "Eww". I appreciate your time, I'll address all your comments togather with others' in the next spin, after I hear from Andrew. (I'm assuming he will have comments too.)