From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFF0C433EF for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233959AbiCIPl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:41:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35700 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233953AbiCIPl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:41:57 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F83315DDE3 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 07:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id z4so2243959pgh.12 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 07:40:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=awNm7ncYJS5runeS2crmI62S72vDnlHWFXIoD08zsCQ=; b=L95s3l8KwvKSoVBp7CenGSpuMYCVVN7GYKixyJEeDlmj6to8MhL0pIcnvDahgNOvxi JfjZ0TGsVg8yLTggwW59sBAVvTyJ2+ahvDMzZ1X/cpIaGcZw/Yfu+FTW13ogQdC5gcUx WduOO+A0oDbV8KctSwlgphgr4QbcVJIbd4eTAk9QTeMSmzdnIvnMpo4DZt6s3GqCCXWQ I9FjVUcItyTicv7V147R87ZLFIeV9kXVghbdYNWZYNmZvi5YRVLgDg/4HmWm3BJp0jeP tBfOIvJm8gJ5J9VEv9NMcb8m5DNZx/lSzmLslFTLe9wlqmNqqJUqnt1TS7+FBUg/Et+J 4D3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=awNm7ncYJS5runeS2crmI62S72vDnlHWFXIoD08zsCQ=; b=we/9WCadzzEd19FSFfYFia1aAbc1nZd3fX79a+q+Qxd3AYWJcqTsJRv+BD9+v5Msez e7i9bFtRgOYfxO0OJVp+TUvH0sizr0Tg2PYzEQRohCQAEZRTpqDfRi8/lYmP9SAHmNrH xXDxCFgl85vSTXd3V2XLomf107YNVN0vHUJX6CyjGTD6tN1Lib5nBSS+CoGGcn+lrXfm nzq5zQzI/y9sPSYrIaH5MM39Zl/SCWOX7pbIrUQXnhhaP9i6/pQg1BI721nJxclF5jZp sML8JL4jzC9dluFpPJsxxb1PqoT9rU6ysOhlzh04ELPvMLMVKoXlXKpISxXPuvv1Lg1p 5spg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532sTsTZWbxXZuSu+iLowXX3+xSL68677xV4koL0NELAyyVWMZWf RFmzCpEJtknrOhSIRz3o9aHlYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0fy+gKxWpiweokALKmNhNvXvpZLPvXf3Aa/Du9Pmy7tGAgvR6HKEPghwWq0MWpSuGrYsfnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:ac1:b0:4f1:29e4:b3a1 with SMTP id c1-20020a056a000ac100b004f129e4b3a1mr295081pfl.63.1646840457963; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 07:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1-20020a637e41000000b003804d0e2c9esm2819543pgn.35.2022.03.09.07.40.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Mar 2022 07:40:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:40:53 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Maxim Levitsky , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kieran Bingham , Jan Kiszka , Andrew Jones , Jonathan Corbet , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Johannes Berg , Wanpeng Li , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jessica Yu , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Yang Weijiang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Shuah Khan , Andrew Morton , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask Message-ID: References: <20210811122927.900604-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> <20210811122927.900604-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com> <0cdac80177eea408b7e316bd1fc4c0c5839ba1d4.camel@redhat.com> <3221c2385e1148fe0ee77d4717b52726e1db9d8d.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 09, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 3/9/22 13:31, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Question: is it worth it? Since I am very busy with various things, this > > feature, beeing just small debug help which I used once in a while doesn't > > get much time from me. > > I agree it's not very much worth. I don't have a use case, was just trying to find the bottom of my inbox and came across this thread.