From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation/barriers: Add memory barrier dma_mb()
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 12:08:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YodouVpl26890QfU@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520031548.175582-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:15AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The memory barrier dma_mb() is introduced by commit a76a37777f2c
> ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ensure queue is read after updating prod pointer"),
> which is used to ensure that prior (both reads and writes) accesses to
> memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent MMIO write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> index b12df9137e1c..1eabcc0e4eca 100644
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -1894,10 +1894,13 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
>
> (*) dma_wmb();
> (*) dma_rmb();
> + (*) dma_mb();
>
> These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
> of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
> - DMA capable device.
> + DMA capable device, in the case of ensure the prior (both reads and
> + writes) accesses to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent
> + MMIO write, dma_mb().
>
I think this is out of place; this explanation here is not yet
elaborating on either. Elaboration on dma_mb() should go where
dma_rmb() and dma_wmb() are explained.
Something like this:
------ >8 ------
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index b12df9137e1c..fb322b6cce70 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1894,6 +1894,7 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
(*) dma_wmb();
(*) dma_rmb();
+ (*) dma_mb();
These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
@@ -1925,11 +1926,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership
before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
- can see it now has ownership. Note that, when using writel(), a prior
- wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes
- have completed before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper
- writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used
- here.
+ can see it now has ownership. The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and a
+ dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed to
+ guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before
+ writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide
+ this guarantee and must not be used here.
See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on
relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst file for
------ >8 ------
Also, now that you're making dma_mb() part of the official API, it might
need a generic definition in include/asm-generic/barrier.h, because
as-is it's only available in arm64 builds.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
-- Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 3:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Fix kcsan test_barrier fail and panic Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20 3:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation/barriers: Add memory barrier dma_mb() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20 10:08 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-05-20 11:14 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20 3:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kcsan: Support detecting more missing memory barriers Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20 10:14 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YodouVpl26890QfU@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).