linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <guro@fb.com>, "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 17:12:51 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqarMyNo9oHxhZFh@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404171dc-0da3-21f2-5003-9718f875e967@redhat.com>

Hello,

On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 11:02:38PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> That is the behavior enforced by setting the CPU_EXCLUSIVE bit in cgroup v1.
> I haven't explicitly change it to make it different in cgroup v2. The major
> reason is that I don't want change to one cpuset to affect a sibling
> partition as it may make the code more complicate to validate if a partition
> is valid.

If at all possible, I'd really like to avoid situations where a parent can't
withdraw resources due to something that a descendant does.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-13  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-10 15:34 [PATCH v11 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: cpu partition code enhancements Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 1/8] cgroup/cpuset: Add top_cpuset check in update_tasks_cpumask() Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 2/8] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous cleanups & add helper functions Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have empty cpuset.cpus.effective Waiman Long
2022-06-12 17:40   ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-12 17:41     ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  2:53       ` Waiman Long
2022-06-13  2:55         ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  3:04           ` Waiman Long
2022-06-13 14:02           ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-13 16:47             ` Waiman Long
2022-06-13 17:23               ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  2:50     ` Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 4/8] cgroup/cpuset: Relax constraints to partition & cpus changes Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 5/8] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition type Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Show invalid partition reason string Waiman Long
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst Waiman Long
2022-06-12 17:49   ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  3:02     ` Waiman Long
2022-06-13  3:12       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-06-13 13:18         ` Waiman Long
2022-06-13 17:06           ` Waiman Long
2022-06-13 14:24         ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-13 17:28           ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13 17:55             ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-13 18:00               ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-14 11:53                 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-27 19:10                   ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-30 14:32                     ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-30 22:53                       ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-10 15:34 ` [PATCH v11 8/8] kselftest/cgroup: Add cpuset v2 partition root state test Waiman Long
2022-05-21 10:24   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2022-05-22  2:40     ` Waiman Long
2022-05-20 16:00 ` [PATCH v11 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: cpu partition code enhancements Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-20 16:46   ` Waiman Long
2022-05-24 16:48     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqarMyNo9oHxhZFh@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).