From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: selftests: Test unavailable event filters are rejected
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 10:46:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG+e55VbXd/YCnnV@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230420104622.12504-4-ljrcore@126.com>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote:
> From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
>
> From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
>
> Adds unsupported input test cases for PMU filter. Specifically,
> it tests the input of unsupported "action" values, unsupported
> "flags" values, and unsupported "nevents" values, which should
> all return an error, as they are currently unsupported by the
> filter. Additionally, the patch tests setting non-exist fixed
> counters in the fixed bitmap doesn't fail.
>
> This change aims to improve the testing of the PMU filter and
> ensure that it functions correctly in all supported use cases.
> The patch has been tested and verified to function correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
> ---
> .../kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> index 4e87eea6986b..a3d5c30ce914 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@
> #define ARCH_PERFMON_BRANCHES_RETIRED 5
>
> #define NUM_BRANCHES 42
> +#define FIXED_CTR_NUM_MASK GENMASK_ULL(4, 0)
> +#define PMU_EVENT_FILTER_INVALID_ACTION (KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY + 1)
> +#define PMU_EVENT_FILTER_INVALID_FLAGS (KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS + 1)
> +#define PMU_EVENT_FILTER_INVALID_NEVENTS (MAX_FILTER_EVENTS + 1)
>
> /*
> * This is how the event selector and unit mask are stored in an AMD
> @@ -743,10 +747,22 @@ static int run_filter_test(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const uint64_t *events,
> return r;
> }
>
> +static uint8_t get_kvm_supported_fixed_num(void)
> +{
> + const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_entry;
> +
> + if (host_cpu_is_amd)
> + return 0;
> +
> + kvm_entry = get_cpuid_entry(kvm_get_supported_cpuid(), 0xa, 0);
> + return kvm_entry->edx & FIXED_CTR_NUM_MASK;
Ah, I got ahead of myself. This is where the KVM_X86_PROPERTY comes in.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-20 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: selftests: Add tests for pmu event filter Jinrong Liang
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: selftests: Replace int with uint32_t for nevents Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: selftests: Apply create_pmu_event_filter() to fixed ctrs Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 17:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: selftests: Test unavailable event filters are rejected Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 17:46 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Add documentation for fixed ctr on PMU filter Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 17:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: selftests: Check if pmu_event_filter meets expectations on fixed ctrs Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: selftests: Check gp event filters without affecting fixed event filters Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 18:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-20 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test pmu event filter with incompatible kvm_pmu_event_filter Jinrong Liang
2023-05-24 23:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-25 2:19 ` Jinrong Liang
2023-05-25 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-22 3:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: selftests: Add tests for pmu event filter Jinrong Liang
2023-05-22 15:02 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZG+e55VbXd/YCnnV@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljr.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).