From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Petr Tesařík" <petr@tesarici.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 4/7] swiotlb: Dynamically allocated bounce buffers
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 10:54:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGyNQxY6By1QdXur@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230517132748.2e250f9c@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 01:27:48PM +0200, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2023 08:35:10 +0200
> Petr Tesařík <petr@tesarici.cz> wrote:
> > Anyway, my greatest objection to allocating additional swiotlb chunks is
> > that _all_ of them must be searched to determine that the physical
> > address does _not_ belong to a swiotlb, incurring performance penalty
>
> I thought about this part again, and I overlooked one option. We can
> track only the _active_ swiotlbs for each device. If a device never
> needs a swiotlb, there is no active swiotlb, and is_swiotlb_buffer()
> short-circuits to false. This should avoid all collateral damage to
> innocent devices.
Does this work with dma-buf or does dma-buf not allow swiotlb bouncing?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 9:18 [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/7] Allow dynamic allocation of software IO TLB bounce buffers Petr Tesarik
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/7] swiotlb: Use a helper to initialize swiotlb fields in struct device Petr Tesarik
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/7] swiotlb: Move code around in preparation for dynamic bounce buffers Petr Tesarik
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 3/7] dma-mapping: introduce the DMA_ATTR_MAY_SLEEP attribute Petr Tesarik
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 4/7] swiotlb: Dynamically allocated bounce buffers Petr Tesarik
2023-05-15 19:43 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-05-16 6:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-16 6:39 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-16 17:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-17 6:35 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-17 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 7:32 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-17 9:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-17 9:58 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-17 11:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-17 11:27 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-23 9:54 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-05-23 11:53 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-16 6:16 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 5/7] swiotlb: Add a boot option to enable dynamic " Petr Tesarik
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 6/7] drm: Use DMA_ATTR_MAY_SLEEP from process context Petr Tesarik
2023-05-09 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 7/7] swiotlb: per-device flag if there are dynamically allocated buffers Petr Tesarik
2023-05-14 18:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-15 8:48 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-15 10:00 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-15 16:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-16 7:55 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-16 11:22 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGyNQxY6By1QdXur@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=petr@tesarici.cz \
--cc=petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).