Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-12T16:54:33Z

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:19:53 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> >> Don't think it is way to go, and I don't think there is anything good
> >> with preventing device drivers from labeling their pins the way they
> >> want.
> >
> >We had a long argument about how label should have a clearly defined
> >meaning. We're not going to rehash it on every revision. What did I miss :|
>
> Well, as I understand we are discussing if dpll subsystem shall prevent
> labeling the SyncE type pins. I have labeled them in ice explicitly with
> the name of a pci device they belong to.
>
> You haven't miss much, mostly the problem is described in this thread.