RE: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-06-28T09:51:07Z

>From: Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
>Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 11:15 AM
>
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 12:18 PM
>>
>>Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:38:10PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
>wrote:
>>
>>>v8 -> v9:
>>
>>Could you please address all the unresolved issues from v8 and send v10?
>>I'm not reviewing this one.
>>
>>Thanks!
>
>Sure, will do, but first missing to-do/discuss list:
>1) remove mode_set as not used by any driver
>2) remove "no-added-value" static functions descriptions in
> dpll_core/dpll_netlink
>3) merge patches [ 03/10, 04/10, 05/10 ] into patches that are compiling
> after each patch apply
>4) remove function return values descriptions/lists
>5) Fix patch [05/10]:
> - status Supported
> - additional maintainers
> - remove callback:
> int (*source_pin_idx_get)(...) from `struct dpll_device_ops`
>6) Fix patch [08/10]: rethink ice mutex locking scheme
>7) Fix patch [09/10]: multiple comments on
>https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZIQu+%2Fo4J0ZBspVg@nanopsycho/#t
>8) add PPS DPLL phase offset to the netlink get-device API
>
>Thank you!
>Arkadiusz

If someone has any objections please state them now, I will work on
all above except 5) and 7).
Vadim, could you take care of those 2 points?

Thank you!
Arkadiusz