From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/resctrl: Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:23:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZK3IQj6+eVAeaNY1@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30b63f35-1839-6870-d81b-1e8bff88dc70@intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 01:50:02PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> > This is expected. When SNC is enabled, CAT still supports the same number of
> > bits in the allocation cache mask. But each bit represents half as much cache.
> >
> > Think of the cache as a 2-D matrix with the cache-ways (bits in the CAT mask)
> > as the columns, and the rows are the hashed index of the physical address.
> > When SNC is turned on the hash function for physical addresses from one
> > of the SNC number nodes will only pick half of those rows (and the other
> > SNC node gets the other half of the rows).
>
> If a test is expected to fail in a particular scenario then I think
> the test failure should be communicated as a "pass". If not this will
> reduce confidence in accuracy of tests. Even so, from the description
> it sounds as though this test can be made more accurate to indeed pass
> in the scenario when SNC is enabled?
Hi Reinette,
Yes. This could be done. The resctrl tests would need to determine
if SNC mode is enabled. But I think that is possible by comparing
output of sysfs files. E.g. with SNC disabled the lists of cpus for a node
and a CPU on that node will match like this:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
0-35,72-107
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index3/shared_cpu_list
0-35,72-107
but with SNC enabled, the CPUs sharing a cache will be divided across
two or four nodes.
It looks like the existing tests may print a warning. I see
this code in:
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
123 res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, 5, benchmark_cmd);
124 ksft_test_result(!res, "CMT: test\n");
125 if ((get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL) && res)
126 ksft_print_msg("Intel CMT may be inaccurate when Sub-NUMA Clustering is enabled. Check BIOS configuration.\n");
but at first glance that warning doesn't appear to try and
check if SNC was the actual problem.
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-21 17:39 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/resctrl: Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor in preparation for node-scoped resources Tony Luck
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/resctrl: Remove hard code of RDT_RESOURCE_L3 in monitor.c Tony Luck
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/resctrl: Add a new node-scoped resource to rdt_resources_all[] Tony Luck
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/resctrl: Add code to setup monitoring at L3 or NODE scope Tony Luck
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add package scoped resource Tony Luck
2023-06-29 7:38 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2023-06-21 17:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-21 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86/resctrl: Determine if Sub-NUMA Cluster is enabled and initialize Tony Luck
2023-06-22 14:25 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-22 16:01 ` Luck, Tony
2023-06-23 15:19 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-23 20:20 ` Tony Luck
2023-06-26 12:18 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-26 12:47 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-26 15:52 ` Luck, Tony
2023-06-26 16:20 ` Luck, Tony
2023-06-28 13:43 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-29 7:34 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-29 15:56 ` Luck, Tony
2023-06-29 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/resctrl: Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-29 16:05 ` Luck, Tony
2023-07-11 20:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-11 21:23 ` Tony Luck [this message]
2023-07-11 21:55 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZK3IQj6+eVAeaNY1@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).