From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71AC835884; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Ug3ZjL5M" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Y5+Oppl7Eai1Gazn1zCuzXFdRsqsodfM2YwuFgSvpsg=; b=Ug3ZjL5M6NrwtZt79VjTUklG89 p324KBMNXDZ9PyVJL5d9VJQzrpkhVQVjDoPYuBg84iNi5li9ab/Jf8uWuHlKXLSDtNHPWW/61eSe4 AG+ddXJDIiYlF83agu24wcF3axsI/tntMA5yMIeT6sJDqV6nLltFlbDLEEfVcQNFPmCIMl1r+Iatd +PnlFxsBbjFN2RzA03CMPm2e/kelhrTuQuFv3wV/5uX5EFXpF2iq3p6UIV30xzQexsNBGx8tcahNa sZE7TnlMcn8x5rc2Z31SeqL7s3LcXHeVHSg/fUmeRdmWC/ytc/ioSHvv/I0y0fkTEsrgZNc2G9MPZ sBCHaH5Q==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rE9Ib-000I0J-Tu; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:36:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:36:21 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" Cc: Jonathan Corbet , "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" , Bagas Sanjaya , Lorenzo Stoakes , Lukas Bulwahn , Kim Phillips , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/mm: Describe folios in physical_memory.rst Message-ID: References: <20231215120022.2010667-1-fabio.maria.de.francesco@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231215120022.2010667-1-fabio.maria.de.francesco@linux.intel.com> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:00:12PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > +A folio is a physically, virtually and logically contiguous set of bytes. > +It is a power-of-two in size, and it is aligned to that same power-of-two. > +It is at least as large as %PAGE_SIZE. If it is in the page cache, it is > +at a file offset which is a multiple of that power-of-two. It may be > +mapped into userspace at an address which is at an arbitrary page offset, > +but its kernel virtual address is aligned to its size. This text is verbatim from include/linux/mm_types.h. It seems sad to have kernel-doc and then replicate it in an rst file. > +As Matthew Wilcox explains in his introduction to folios, the need for oof, no, don't mention my name. > +`struct folio` arises mostly to address issues with the use of compound > +pages. It is often unclear whether a function operates on an individual > +page, or an entire compound page. > + > +"A function which has a `struct page` pointer argument might be > +expecting a head or base page and will BUG if given a tail page. It might > +work with any kind of page and operate on %PAGE_SIZE bytes. It might work > +with any kind of page and operate on page_size() bytes if given a head > +page but %PAGE_SIZE bytes if given a base or tail page. It might operate > +on page_size() bytes if passed a head or tail page. We have examples of > +all of these today.". > + > +A pointer to folio points to a page that is never a tail page. It > +represents an entire compound page. Therefore, there is no need to call > +compound_head() to get a pointer to the head. Folios has eliminted the > +need to unnecessary calls and has avoided bugs related to the misuse of > +pages passed to functions. Furthermore, the inline compound_head() makes > +the kernel bigger and slows things down. > + > +The folio APIs are described in the "Memory Management APIs" document. This was exactly the kind of documentation I was hoping you wouldn't write ;-( It's documentation that makes sense today, but won't in five years time. We want to say something like, A folio represents a single memory allocation. It may be composed of several pages ...