From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BCF8264FA1; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 09:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744105142; cv=none; b=oTJDIz6PRsjkLsuJxCT0iiUEAVHQhGNKrtPgjoHZwkW2ciCbCB+EpuSYaAu69LTybq9aw9FQ7wRldVc67ToJEFNvvvdYfDN7zhHR98SKiofeyGqTSc2HUXuNBjdkkqoDS6HvhWbdV4SaNRun0C7XdbhmHacTx3MnR2XPZT8YcpQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744105142; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6jLG1OuuXBJUAHnNSfsPLbzl7/d33svlvvDOppltdO0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DQt1UxnGVCczsu8U1rHaz5nbG7RyX1NqHa3GDPX01w4j5kDVYouBLNYV8a8js7WaAeuwOATpHHjc1GVCk+kNwTR9z5p2SKkAdeJ//SmrxAG3lC8P1VxfRo79d94R5zY9fvLMrafcypsfe+RcXFxZhwBtHhV0A3No8Fn3Wacu2uc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NiOzex8E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NiOzex8E" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744105141; x=1775641141; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=6jLG1OuuXBJUAHnNSfsPLbzl7/d33svlvvDOppltdO0=; b=NiOzex8Ecp+VLncOpgDeuI+t3jyoPz1+t5RX4WwTzrbvqBlVuHwasiRy RVBdGGDKveJZHZyXRNq/QqXDhgMvN3jNwghiO8kDzsR+X8m+fJlDIPlL2 IKO6jJdLkfejB6NbAunMQqKqRFvmmMeQ/7aVXuekdP+1N+f1GEkoDD0CB 60mfxp8Gu4WZ59WaIRtPcKgtYcZ9pQbG7/K7BQn6Nfcx9t4pq+3nN5cR/ Tio/IUuooIojm2LSk6XmfD6Rg48GeoCz2/xXPInddYg9K8o5HiwqZWaCk mPkFlrukczr9XbOIwGhBNh/kUJ2GzIWgOK2w/BItnjsx00IVt89y1xs2Q g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jcdfs5K9RVCsArf/1YfVmA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: a5FdjuTaRI2vSwe5QGkNHQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11397"; a="45646550" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,197,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="45646550" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2025 02:39:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5VuIt83cTS6l6lfkb4k9BQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: T0BBoRTrT+Wxe1dWjZB5Og== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,197,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="129076090" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2025 02:38:55 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u25Pu-0000000AM6i-3NlY; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 12:38:50 +0300 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:38:50 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Aditya Garg Cc: "alyssa@rosenzweig.io" , Petr Mladek , Sven Peter , Thomas Zimmermann , Aun-Ali Zaidi , Maxime Ripard , "airlied@redhat.com" , Simona Vetter , Steven Rostedt , Rasmus Villemoes , Sergey Senozhatsky , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , "apw@canonical.com" , "joe@perches.com" , "dwaipayanray1@gmail.com" , "lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com" , Kees Cook , "tamird@gmail.com" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Hector Martin , "asahi@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use proper printk format in appletbdrm Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:52:10AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote: > > On 8 Apr 2025, at 2:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:17:13PM +0530, Aditya Garg wrote: > >> The vsprint patch was originally being sent as a seperate patch [1], and > >> I was waiting it to be taken up. But as suggested by Petr, I'm sending > >> them via DRM. > > > > You need to do something about your tools, really. > > Uhh, I'll just revert to the tried and tested macOS mail. > > Although I don't think a resend is necessary here now. I dunno. If people are using `b4`, it might mess up the patch ordering, I haven't checked this myself (it depends if it takes [PATCH x/y] or message threading into account first). It seems not a big deal with _this_ series, but for the future it may be really a problem (esp. from [runtime] bisectability point of view). > > Now it's patch 3 threaded to patch 1, while the rest, including cover letter, > > seems okay. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko