From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB231143886; Thu, 16 May 2024 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715867686; cv=none; b=ngpmMeTcfgkZQ5LXwxS7/CvhKQNGTKIEGRYuEPtSwgjOBYzGPktoF8TbPRKFWa/tQs6NEjnXESuCfFhIdcBg9Fot3p4bTnHUZyMqW/RlpIfe+0l8FIsZFnwjsE+rzkCoNuVHWJKK+FO7aiMmxBXbQI5//1Nf+BgAjVco1XYDemM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715867686; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+/sGHoVHNh7aDbg74jwHs3yv+dQdkDY6SZT5+s9g1/M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SMfu6Xz9xkxzVffYX5i3/85B8ZYsxv36Y+Dx+9UuvvH7QGCK0oepxL8iZvG0FcOKJPemKEbpBsP93KBZ1eGhyprm62c+WYXjmrEMZeBstqM8HI+8qjl7uREj8JYgaBBCzXVEww+bD8feRvjaOsjuI7i8daxRqXJpHqB1zlT1VWU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gz1BKpbF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gz1BKpbF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715867685; x=1747403685; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+/sGHoVHNh7aDbg74jwHs3yv+dQdkDY6SZT5+s9g1/M=; b=gz1BKpbFnY+FmpztnptLByZKBe35QeEkuqbrYQLryDhx+tCELy/lGT8y SxExYcCfhy9dDDHZBHTT5HOBF2/u1ffyhtxu4VeGAedYZBGYW3p9JcUBF 9rNf7/YrmIzL6McB212cWA0mREaRiBEghG7sm8qgxtExVwW4wugxQJXrf j/XlZEfwerp6+lOMXLpUhON3RHdSZfF1kTIKFurc3fDc3NEyeDGmrfnlu RqcktvScs2oE49NKb76bO/W7WRxoRhzcZynIfLXldeCtM9ggq49aPyel+ lf8FQzCEs+3ezc6mhD/CNKv/xzB1DWbjn5Bw9jwMykmFUK0FxOfSTzcPA w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lyYJu9U7Qn2pUv7O/peESQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ByKj6GvsSJCaHnqMHd5Mug== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11074"; a="12190229" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,164,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="12190229" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 May 2024 06:54:44 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pBlz2EjuTyyvjt6hpl+yQA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: L/cy23MOSQK7TU5pBtUfEA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,164,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="36214456" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 May 2024 06:54:41 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s7bZ8-000000084Xq-1boe; Thu, 16 May 2024 16:54:38 +0300 Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 16:54:38 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Vegard Nossum , Kent Gibson , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: Remove legacy API documentation Message-ID: References: <20240508101703.830066-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240508101703.830066-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:17:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > In order to discourage people to use old and legacy GPIO APIs > remove the respective documentation completely. It also helps > further cleanups of the legacy GPIO API leftovers, which is > ongoing task. Bart, Linus, Kent, what do you think about this? If there is a positive consensus, I would even dare to go for v6.10-rc2 with it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko