From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DF61D61B3 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722955780; cv=none; b=MJkTdBnIROJ+J4gdJOmlZXakipD27Oen9zKkQGU1ED3U9DXO+RB6bRQF1g1+8VTRjfQwvhnv9wR2I5WGHukX++1++7W++tTi+hnntSFfWVF3fzOUGbR3Y6J/z1pbojKqtJH4TU0EwUMMbGVrV3VxrK0QcCIiwl/4jUnguNRHx9c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722955780; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mnKji4X1IF1oWVxStSjRy7i5+pY/OgANqpsjHYhRrbk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pspOnk7ajJ+tWM9d1dRRGh8XmY7jM+gtBDVYpsEpNXTfsINs3/RfATRQBwIIiUzATSqjNNqr1C6l8fT/6fusVn58UCiZWrjbdgFIYJSeRBZ+xwN0bAr+1yDcfpp5VKlC4Ac2QLeQ0+mn51zMZsHjO+0t4MLV5oIyUWSE/lihFvI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=CHSEk4LR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CHSEk4LR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722955777; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5zzoZal/wdbh0kOVIOHjUz7WBhOwU4qtFbcRSNDHu/8=; b=CHSEk4LR2DuynT8/YgMyBhsL9cNQUyk2tPkmQ761uzNFZ3LpAAT9h2ZxB4x0CqyACyHRpW 6LgI6+Zch4gADMWYS7NAO7EZv08RwwNFULyL+KyPnScnCHuqyx6nZIAY6MzfqZjK+/J9lN EfQKuBkV/03thfWZSLfvHZYugglEDcQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-593-91ca1en1NQOnYP0mtFQOcg-1; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 10:49:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 91ca1en1NQOnYP0mtFQOcg-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D391944AB4; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.116.14]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A129F1955F40; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 22:47:56 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Daniel Wagner Cc: Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , Sagi Grimberg , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , "Martin K. Petersen" , John Garry , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Kashyap Desai , Sumit Saxena , Shivasharan S , Chandrakanth patil , Sathya Prakash Veerichetty , Suganath Prabu Subramani , Nilesh Javali , GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com, Jonathan Corbet , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , Hannes Reinecke , Sridhar Balaraman , "brookxu.cn" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@broadcom.com, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, storagedev@microchip.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] lib/group_cpus.c: honor housekeeping config when grouping CPUs Message-ID: References: <20240806-isolcpus-io-queues-v3-0-da0eecfeaf8b@suse.de> <20240806-isolcpus-io-queues-v3-14-da0eecfeaf8b@suse.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240806-isolcpus-io-queues-v3-14-da0eecfeaf8b@suse.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > group_cpus_evenly distributes all present CPUs into groups. This ignores > the isolcpus configuration and assigns isolated CPUs into the groups. > > Make group_cpus_evenly aware of isolcpus configuration and use the > housekeeping CPU mask as base for distributing the available CPUs into > groups. > > Fixes: 11ea68f553e2 ("genirq, sched/isolation: Isolate from handling managed interrupts") This patch fixes nothing on commit 11ea68f553e2, please remove the above Fixes tag. Thanks, Ming