From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:32:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwAKgnJmJ6yZ-c50@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002220949.3087902-3-ushankar@purestorage.com>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 04:09:46PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> ublk currently supports the following behaviors on ublk server exit:
>
> A: outstanding I/Os get errors, subsequently issued I/Os get errors
> B: outstanding I/Os get errors, subsequently issued I/Os queue
> C: outstanding I/Os get reissued, subsequently issued I/Os queue
>
> and the following behaviors for recovery of preexisting block devices by
> a future incarnation of the ublk server:
>
> 1: ublk devices stopped on ublk server exit (no recovery possible)
> 2: ublk devices are recoverable using start/end_recovery commands
>
> The userspace interface allows selection of combinations of these
> behaviors using flags specified at device creation time, namely:
>
> default behavior: A + 1
> UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY: B + 2
> UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY|UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE: C + 2
>
> We can't easily change the userspace interface to allow independent
> selection of one of {A, B, C} and one of {1, 2}, but we can refactor the
> internal helpers which test for the flags. Replace the existing helpers
> with the following set:
>
> ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding: tests for behavior C
> ublk_nosrv_[dev_]should_queue_io: tests for behavior B
> ublk_nosrv_should_stop_dev: tests for behavior 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 22:09 [PATCH v3 0/5] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-10-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ublk: check recovery flags for validity Uday Shankar
2024-10-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers Uday Shankar
2024-10-04 15:32 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-10-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ublk: merge stop_work and quiesce_work Uday Shankar
2024-10-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-10-04 15:34 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-02 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO Uday Shankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwAKgnJmJ6yZ-c50@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).