From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904AD190676; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730106437; cv=none; b=ahJThqo6FgoBtlx+ZSLfreMnhnnJmX6ZA2fuE4O3FH2q5lLbG4q66vgBAk6i47XDh4ZyN5Yd7tbRp2aB9qF0imjdhSuWP1UIIa4Rennms9f5lBn0BN8QK1vQa9cnSewQ5gJYxFhZrVZ+l/znNdBUOYe+N2Tv1iNLyO4lOVQ8nR8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730106437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Naxc3y4FABd852aPR9mjcknRF9y0zxHqM+ldzWUuEKY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fx0/3+lk7OjjKW61si4xjkl6e+XCNOhtNvrzlW6xX9lj5b8ro8otJG37rJsEfS0lRpi+/SnSo5oikWXJVoOLgYcAbH53xMEXeuyLTI4hSbmIshjPB0CCgtADDCGMG+0jZo5IOKnQ91WX3BPSdyJP46Z8JtL1jYgvGWBpPfu/8dw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=M7jmgCUm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="M7jmgCUm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730106435; x=1761642435; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Naxc3y4FABd852aPR9mjcknRF9y0zxHqM+ldzWUuEKY=; b=M7jmgCUm4pjKs8YQAlYKqwAZIdl+n0JlEbo+XgVYA/LR86LUBKSS0ty2 1eBrjl9lr1Kg0Fs418KCl6vCyuVLeqD8+G2TzV1UsfiKc9lrARSHW86H1 VOmTFrVor+QqMeWCB2PL7TJGbZ0+3SwxrTHNFZhSqWNKlRIhXLC+SvTRV g3AU5Aa1PGMtZo8KwQY/LspBSccT3EvHAKIBvu9N/bFp7wmeYRNSIsTWl 8aMA2X5PLlqgUXQHfnQHsl8tbVnWy0hdZYd89Yh7v8Hojckie4fU8jTim ve+uM8t/oRq4VFcmRDK4XMaNd5LKEdEHsHtJ41d+uEfKM7vglYhyBltyk g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Kylu9J3qQNOhD9TwJMqJtQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MNjxQWxxSaGiEHGWLjstkQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11238"; a="40271369" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,238,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="40271369" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2024 02:07:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /HGdaufvQ+aRJ5cWieWNLg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: U5DGNk2jRdqOpvlW82ydDw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,238,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="112392227" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2024 02:07:04 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1t5LiG-00000007t2b-2TNh; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:07:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:07:00 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ira Weiny Cc: Andrew Morton , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Rasmus Villemoes , Sergey Senozhatsky , Jonathan Corbet , Davidlohr Bueso , Jonathan Cameron , Dave Jiang , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , Dan Williams , Fan Ni , Bagas Sanjaya , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] test printf: Add very basic struct resource tests Message-ID: References: <20241025-cxl-pra-v2-0-123a825daba2@intel.com> <20241025-cxl-pra-v2-1-123a825daba2@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241025-cxl-pra-v2-1-123a825daba2@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 07:46:53PM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote: > The printf tests for struct resource were stubbed out. struct range > printing will leverage the struct resource implementation. > > To prevent regression add some basic sanity tests for struct resource. ... > + struct resource test_resource = { > + .start = 0xc0ffee00, > + .end = 0xc0ffee00, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, > + }; > + > + test("[mem 0xc0ffee00 flags 0x200]", > + "%pr", &test_resource); > + > + test_resource = (struct resource) { > + .start = 0xc0ffee, > + .end = 0xba5eba11, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, > + }; > + test("[mem 0x00c0ffee-0xba5eba11 flags 0x200]", > + "%pr", &test_resource); > + > + test_resource = (struct resource) { > + .start = 0xba5eba11, > + .end = 0xc0ffee, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, > + }; > + test("[mem 0xba5eba11-0x00c0ffee flags 0x200]", > + "%pr", &test_resource); > + > + test_resource = (struct resource) { > + .start = 0xba5eba11, > + .end = 0xba5eca11, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, > + }; > + > + test("[mem 0xba5eba11-0xba5eca11 flags 0x200]", > + "%pr", &test_resource); > + > + test_resource = (struct resource) { > + .start = 0xba11, > + .end = 0xca10, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_IO | > + IORESOURCE_DISABLED | > + IORESOURCE_UNSET, > + }; I know that I have given my tag, but I just realized that you may use DEFINE_RES_*() macros here. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko