From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5418BEE; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730728218; cv=none; b=gsSLwrTCfVDH4EX6oiGpVcYysGvlpsGeVSzS77v2i8hvvQNC9EXGrgOw10ClXsX/wpxZ/2HnPyMJolCcjEsM8TEfVX2jq87AuN2U445mA6PBckWfPh7BoO9iVlFlTbFXODoEjd8R6AHVLa5wMbhO8Zo/wN9OY5+EN8axsZHGLpo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730728218; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gHreMDif9HESvX6AXP7OsdTpnwAWyyEiLjrEvTpLHVo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=s41LcjV6l5mTaxxgMU7N6pnME8cT29DSzL7O9jQZ1XGy+KfCfB95OKvKmSx5oNxQ9bIFZV6fcQ7ioLKT+86wv39uc+PfqmwP1nDFrn7dxiUCBcBT4BT1ZTEqF+Y5s7bwC3UZ/0OL8FSh4d1PYSQ0MrQGy+53S6uFGt0DwzjE3wA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ODZUPZxA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ODZUPZxA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0FABC4CECE; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:50:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730728218; bh=gHreMDif9HESvX6AXP7OsdTpnwAWyyEiLjrEvTpLHVo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ODZUPZxAxatXofqe2Bld8arK3JWihWtKbNZfcXqX1Qf87UMLWi3hF/TzVU959+6em fM185BPRmGZp26BoXlrsTz610JqrwDi0WcRxnPrsP6ToWjoeft2AbY3ew4lJVvjYLh b3UsoWIw+j2Ee8wSQLuN11csURoY/J+vxNvd+/OCTj3WAYEq6JlEJULA/ex4wqUfXB vON8dyM58tsQTjxhAuZ7kksGBxhcdFgtGzesTATQbB9zAIieSHFnasG5fVTZEzvLcu 2EYAFZcBWUjRisQxl3Th16iOEEIZHoWmT+UzvffCOYLTZsRoWSJ7W8/Xb6xfgD8bM4 cfxzweH6TjX0Q== Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:47:40 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: SeongJae Park , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , "Liam R . Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Jann Horn , Alice Ryhl , Boqun Feng , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suren Baghdasaryan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/mm: add VMA locks documentation Message-ID: References: <8e02f3a4-d498-401d-aaba-e53ed2ac6a3a@lucifer.local> <20241101234832.56873-1-sj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:02:19PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:48:32PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote: > > > > This is the "Unsorted Documentation" section. If the document is really for > > the section, I'd suggest putting it in alphabetically sorted order, for the > > consistency. However, if putting the document under the section is not your > > real intention, I think it might be better to be put under "Process Addresses" > > section above. What do you think? > > Well, at the moment it's sort of a WIP thing that we may want to put under > another section, was just putting there somewhat arbitrarily for now. > > I also wanted to avoid too much debate about what to put where :P > > But absolutely, ack, will either sort it there or put it somewhere more > sensible, thanks! Don't mean to bikeshed, but it would make sense to put it to the "Process Address (space)" part :) -- Sincerely yours, Mike.