From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
corbet@lwn.net, tony.luck@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, tglx@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, kees@kernel.org, elver@google.com,
lirongqing@baidu.com, paulmck@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, alexandre.chartre@oracle.com,
yazen.ghannam@amd.com, peterz@infradead.org,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com, kim.phillips@amd.com, xin@zytor.com,
naveen@kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, peternewman@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] x86/resctrl: Support Privilege-Level Zero Association (PLZA)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 11:56:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a737ae9e-9cbc-46bb-b565-0b888e69f0ea@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <081b5cd6-37a3-4aaf-862b-b41e9536bb66@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 6/11/2026 6:23 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 4/30/26 4:24 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Customers have identified an issue while using the QoS resource Control
>
> "Control" -> "control"?
>
ack
>> feature. If a memory bandwidth associated with a CLOSID is aggressively
>
> "a memory bandwidth" -> "memory bandwidth"?
ack.
>
>> throttled, and it moves into Kernel mode, the Kernel operations are also
>
> What does "it" refer to here? From text it seems to be the "CLOSID" but that
> does not sound right? Should "it" instead be something like "a task with that
> CLOSID"?
sure.
>
> "Kernel" -> "kernel"?
ack.
>
>> aggressively throttled. This can stall forward progress and eventually
>> degrade overall system performance. AMD hardware supports a feature
>> Privilege-Level Zero Association (PLZA) to change the association of the
>> thread as soon as it begins executing.
>
> "change the association of the thread as soon as it begins executing." I am
> not able to parse this.
How about ?
Customers have identified an issue while using the QoS resource Control
feature. If memory bandwidth associated with a CLOSID is aggressively
throttled, and a task with that CLOSID moves into kernel mode, the
kernel operations are also aggressively throttled. This can stall
forward progress and eventually degrade overall system performance.
AMD hardware supports a feature Privilege-Level Zero Association (PLZA)
to change the CPU association at the user-to-kernel transition, so the
kernel execution can use a different association than user mode.
Privilege-Level Zero Association (PLZA) allows the user to specify a
CLOSID and/or RMID associated with execution in Privilege-Level Zero.
When enabled on a CPU, as the CPU enters Privilege-Level Zero,
allocation and monitoring for that CPU will be associated with the PLZA
CLOSID and/or RMID. Otherwise, the CPU will be associated with the
CLOSID and RMID given by PQR_ASSOC.
>>
>> Privilege-Level Zero Association (PLZA) allows the user to specify a CLOSID
>> and/or RMID associated with execution in Privilege-Level Zero. When enabled
>> on a HW thread, when the thread enters Privilege-Level Zero, transactions
>
> Could you please use consistent terminology throughout this series? This patch
> uses "HW thread"/"thread", the next patch then switches to "logical processor",
> and then by patch #4 the term seems to settle on "CPU". Could this just be
> "CPU" from here and throughout series to be consistent and easier to read?
>
> What is meant with "transactions"? Is this just about memory transactions?
> Using this term combined with earlier "memory bandwidth" related problem description
> hints that this feature just impacts memory bandwidth allocation but from what
> I understand this impacts all allocation (CLOSID of all resources) and monitoring.
>
> Could "transactions" be replaced with "allocation and monitoring" and be
> more accurate?
>
>> associated with that thread will be associated with the PLZA CLOSID and/or
>> RMID. Otherwise, the HW thread will be associated with the CLOSID and RMID
>> identified by PQR_ASSOC.
>>
>> Add PLZA support to resctrl and introduce a kernel parameter that allows
>> enabling or disabling the feature at boot time.
>>
>> The GLBE feature details are documented in:
>
> "GLBE" -> "PLZA"?
>
ack.
>>
>> AMD64 Zen6 Platform Quality of Service (PQOS) Extensions:
>> Publication # 69193 Revision: 1.00, Issue Date: March 2026
>>
>> available at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537
>
> Please follow same style as what you used in the assignable counter enabling where
> this URL is provided via a "Link:" tag and then the text can refer to it. Specifically,
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537 # [1]
>
Sure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v3: Code did not change. Patch order cahnged.
>> Added documentation link.
>>
>> v2: Rebased on top of the latest tip.
>> ---
>> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
>
> Please split changes to other subsystems and make these changes
> obvious with their own subject prefix to avoid sneaking changes into
> other subsystems via resctrl.
>
Ok. Will be two patches.
1. For Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
2. arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
thanks
Babu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 23:24 [PATCH v3 00/12] [PATCH v3 00/12] x86/resctrl: Add kernel-mode (e.g., PLZA) support to the resctrl subsystem Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] x86/resctrl: Support Privilege-Level Zero Association (PLZA) Babu Moger
2026-06-11 23:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-12 16:56 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2026-06-12 17:00 ` Moger, Babu
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] x86/resctrl: Add data structures and definitions for PLZA configuration Babu Moger
2026-06-11 23:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-12 15:40 ` Luck, Tony
2026-06-12 17:46 ` Moger, Babu
2026-06-12 17:32 ` Moger, Babu
2026-06-12 17:49 ` Moger, Babu
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] fs/resctrl: Add kernel mode (kmode) data structures and arch hook Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] x86,fs/resctrl: Program PLZA through kmode arch hooks Babu Moger
2026-05-19 20:59 ` Luck, Tony
2026-05-20 17:49 ` Babu Moger
2026-05-20 22:16 ` Luck, Tony
2026-05-20 23:09 ` Moger, Babu
2026-06-11 11:44 ` Peter Newman
2026-06-11 14:46 ` Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] x86/resctrl: Initialize supported kernel modes for PLZA Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] fs/resctrl: Initialize the global kernel-mode policy at subsystem init Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] fs/resctrl: Add info/kernel_mode for kernel-mode policy introspection Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] fs/resctrl: Make info/kernel_mode writable and identify the bound group Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] fs/resctrl: Reset kernel-mode binding when its rdtgroup goes away Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] fs/resctrl: Expose kmode_cpus / kmode_cpus_list per rdtgroup Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] resctrl: Hide kmode_cpus[_list] on groups not bound to kernel-mode Babu Moger
2026-04-30 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] fs/resctrl: Allow user space to write kmode_cpus / kmode_cpus_list Babu Moger
2026-06-11 21:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] [PATCH v3 00/12] x86/resctrl: Add kernel-mode (e.g., PLZA) support to the resctrl subsystem Reinette Chatre
2026-06-12 15:37 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a737ae9e-9cbc-46bb-b565-0b888e69f0ea@amd.com \
--to=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox