From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: tie sqe allocation to io instead of queue
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 15:40:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aB2xd4593ZkWuMbB@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507-ublk_task_per_io-v6-4-a2a298783c01@purestorage.com>
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 03:49:38PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> We currently have a helper ublk_queue_alloc_sqes which the ublk targets
> use to allocate SQEs for their own operations. However, as we move
> towards decoupled ublk_queues and ublk server threads, this helper does
> not make sense anymore. SQEs are allocated from rings, and we will have
> one ring per thread to avoid locking. Change the SQE allocation helper
> to ublk_io_alloc_sqes. Currently this still allocates SQEs from the io's
> queue's ring, but when we fully decouple threads and queues, it will
> allocate from the io's thread's ring instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/fault_inject.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c | 6 +++---
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 3 ++-
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h | 11 +++++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/null.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/ublk/stripe.c | 4 ++--
> 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/fault_inject.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/fault_inject.c
> index 6bc8ee519b483ba6a365dccb03ad389425eefd3b..101c6dad6cf1f6dd45bbc46baa793493b97646bf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/fault_inject.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/fault_inject.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int ublk_fault_inject_queue_io(struct ublk_queue *q, int tag)
> .tv_nsec = (long long)q->dev->private_data,
> };
>
> - ublk_queue_alloc_sqes(q, &sqe, 1);
> + ublk_io_alloc_sqes(ublk_get_io(q, tag), &sqe, 1);
> io_uring_prep_timeout(sqe, &ts, 1, 0);
> sqe->user_data = build_user_data(tag, ublksrv_get_op(iod), 0, q->q_id, 1);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c
> index 69991ac7a0a947acba7b23ac89348936a3fcef75..563f11a21604bbf5b9531f69f806d09cdd785960 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static int loop_queue_flush_io(struct ublk_queue *q, const struct ublksrv_io_des
> unsigned ublk_op = ublksrv_get_op(iod);
> struct io_uring_sqe *sqe[1];
>
> - ublk_queue_alloc_sqes(q, sqe, 1);
> + ublk_io_alloc_sqes(ublk_get_io(q, tag), sqe, 1);
> io_uring_prep_fsync(sqe[0], 1 /*fds[1]*/, IORING_FSYNC_DATASYNC);
> io_uring_sqe_set_flags(sqe[0], IOSQE_FIXED_FILE);
> /* bit63 marks us as tgt io */
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static int loop_queue_tgt_rw_io(struct ublk_queue *q, const struct ublksrv_io_de
> struct io_uring_sqe *sqe[3];
>
> if (!zc) {
> - ublk_queue_alloc_sqes(q, sqe, 1);
> + ublk_io_alloc_sqes(ublk_get_io(q, tag), sqe, 1);
> if (!sqe[0])
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int loop_queue_tgt_rw_io(struct ublk_queue *q, const struct ublksrv_io_de
> return 1;
> }
>
> - ublk_queue_alloc_sqes(q, sqe, 3);
> + ublk_io_alloc_sqes(ublk_get_io(q, tag), sqe, 3);
>
> io_uring_prep_buf_register(sqe[0], 0, tag, q->q_id, tag);
> sqe[0]->flags |= IOSQE_CQE_SKIP_SUCCESS | IOSQE_IO_HARDLINK;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> index d0eaf06fadbbb00c0549bba0a08f1be23baa2359..7b3af98546803134dd7f959c40408cefda7cd45c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
> @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static int ublk_queue_init(struct ublk_queue *q)
> for (i = 0; i < q->q_depth; i++) {
> q->ios[i].buf_addr = NULL;
> q->ios[i].flags = UBLKSRV_NEED_FETCH_RQ | UBLKSRV_IO_FREE;
> + q->ios[i].q = q;
>
> if (q->state & UBLKSRV_NO_BUF)
> continue;
> @@ -554,7 +555,7 @@ int ublk_queue_io_cmd(struct ublk_queue *q, struct ublk_io *io, unsigned tag)
> if (io_uring_sq_space_left(&q->ring) < 1)
> io_uring_submit(&q->ring);
>
> - ublk_queue_alloc_sqes(q, sqe, 1);
> + ublk_io_alloc_sqes(ublk_get_io(q, tag), sqe, 1);
> if (!sqe[0]) {
> ublk_err("%s: run out of sqe %d, tag %d\n",
> __func__, q->q_id, tag);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h
> index 34f92bb2c64d0ddc7690b2654613e0c77b2b8121..7c912116606429215af7dbc2a8ce6b40ef89bfbd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ struct ublk_io {
> unsigned short flags;
> unsigned short refs; /* used by target code only */
>
> + struct ublk_queue *q;
> +
> int result;
In following patch, you added 'tag' to 'struct ublk_io', then 8bytes 'struct
ublk_queue *q' needn't to be added because it can be figured out by
container_of():
- queue->ios can be calculated by 'io' address & its tag.
- please add one helper ublk_io_to_queue(io) for it.
Also please try to avoid hole to 'ublk_io'.
Otherwise, this patch looks fine.
thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 21:49 [PATCH v6 0/8] ublk: decouple server threads from hctxs Uday Shankar
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 3:29 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-10 23:54 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-11 0:17 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] sbitmap: fix off-by-one when wrapping hint Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 3:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-11 0:35 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: plumb q_id in io_uring user_data Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 7:28 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: tie sqe allocation to io instead of queue Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 7:40 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: lift queue initialization out of thread Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 7:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: move per-thread data out of ublk_queue Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: decouple ublk_queues from ublk server threads Uday Shankar
2025-05-09 8:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-09 8:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_RR_TAGS Uday Shankar
2025-05-07 23:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-05-08 2:08 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aB2xd4593ZkWuMbB@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).