From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E652254859 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745950245; cv=none; b=JQtz8RQx3mh3EBqNoBsDXwZJ4CGfqsYGtxZvegJLwjkSV02MtVIeCuTHW3whUmssIKBJnYgI8yEv4CP5z0LNNB4FGUmR6LFBVOuP0XT7vST81qds8ZVCatZwGqYpjBlNQBqPW2f/THvqcF5CUKWt+WzZ+hxXT+TT1GEVs/ULRQM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745950245; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ziulb9mMltIWQNEALJDPRlCWsnKPBKb9mm4o9Za3zo0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V4BRCTBK0gk5T2Qd7iNr3acfBK45yfnaiePaKiMcWUzAd2alWCeMGp313Bb3WYItk/1nNZX1Qa/Fx3oIcgjHsmUB9yYqwfIgteeVwRw+iykS8ILkiGwMeS0gLtfoQBiVZerHfQBqMskNucXoDY73bJqs6TQbk6MmnhB7RdHBBcA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=qGyu/E3f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="qGyu/E3f" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2242ac37caeso43215ad.1 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:10:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1745950243; x=1746555043; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ftw/IjMpgU7GPfLzcouQoWIfms9GOb854vnlNb5+taU=; b=qGyu/E3fthiFZeH93oRX/PX4jUwxbwTNQFN9rDwqn4UUhnO6idkhVsVvOq54Uqe/X5 JqqeThXu0muKP/BvVDBSuAJw1O+L5ZXhVvcmzSfGa9ARMMQ9WDq1ok0nNNwqaOqK5Qe8 0wQKbVLZa/WNb2LPjb1UAO2sELZt44MdlhDP+sFTQhkB8qnxbXamoo0rh7HhCOrEHFf+ PAfpztp3a+GvKt4rRVipQPLagMsc43PP0tqYxafXsWbGZuMKcc/vYq4hejMRpy7gTpMB nGpsTTigmEli8jWVDyQE+qy3JfAs/cnipM8BCzvJG9cYO3K7Nky3ByqO8v6u0OQT6p6m JdmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745950243; x=1746555043; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Ftw/IjMpgU7GPfLzcouQoWIfms9GOb854vnlNb5+taU=; b=uzPxpaeP092HrAunTrorvjUQrrPrOHg3XEK5YBo8I/JE7yidERBje3W7wJaOLwmjYr zT4k7xGk0KO3mG9JB/v8zDVjQwtnsGGuXcxKmAtHvA8vw5AfRZTpP0oPNNLzxbKdntfF zqpDTlM9thsQLYgBztzLHw9jW7Tmsr0esphsB8ggVByS7SKiS5HJT1TjrTYmJ4gVUtdR mo8mJWRSDxqEHcvIH+yzbWSJRlBEB7mChuKvIG/ZSTe/5f41BfMILf5elXGPLRsE3V4H Yeyg7jKO4jt1vSGtGGMHKgy40QxQ1fPMAqnOoqeEUhyJWCjin/ASw8EGw40Hdl/2Cvwi Dnkw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWZJJEKFt9iOgCqJB2BJylaCyJXVJ0LDIvCnfAPzNT48ACn8zJZz0qp3Er68BAdBoO3mai1t0KN2PY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWDzgBsJ/yGuKC/Lzfnkhld/QHUY/QHanszXHC0GZ5IuOINRvC egt+R9PlgukeaVsmY/0EXMI0Opx8diCc5bNlR7VEzKzVkaXYslNAtzNDxvABEA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuz6DcXi3rd7nnTI4kHVNsx+9opN2+WuzXKf7rb/tlDHm7FNn8FlPBzxEl9Kvh 3PFlJJS9OhM3RP+LL0wst+jo4NQggJQUDkCYCCs3YyRPgxIUpyFkGLpggowNw6AAGYzpF+3xDSG F6ChOdUkvsYoUtsSss35RSn4AkMkdQEeOfbrBbQA2j0vrVDQsRyZ4C/QDAKMEGewzYrH+f0zDZR Od0y+NEQTsGTs0yRRc5ZpPS3whYPJ97LaQTz8RXvnL438BGJE7QyNte0h7xrPtE1KSttuTfWX6s QK7K1leHeip/54mSjiBqKAYtjYBsZSa+cZMGCplvMPPdn14AUb7enHCaQjfFzwGsjr5zbees X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGtuGPnrFdA7EnAS7AeHO3rAMJ1bXf2n0ATFrXiwa1CPLZUhde5Z8nusKLhSnrBiMW3CwVgA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d486:b0:224:38a:bd39 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22df406ab2dmr130415ad.20.1745950242565; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (2.210.143.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.143.210.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-73e25912efbsm10222670b3a.23.2025.04.29.11.10.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:10:31 +0000 From: Pranjal Shrivastava To: Nicolin Chen Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, will@kernel.org, bagasdotme@gmail.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, shuah@kernel.org, jsnitsel@redhat.com, nathan@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, yi.l.liu@intel.com, mshavit@google.com, zhangzekun11@huawei.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, mochs@nvidia.com, alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com, vasant.hegde@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/22] iommufd/viommmu: Add IOMMUFD_CMD_VCMDQ_ALLOC ioctl Message-ID: References: <094992b874190ffdcf6012104b419c8649b5e4b4.1745646960.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 08:28:01AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 03:44:08PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:34:05PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:58:05PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > [...] > > > IIUC, one vintf can have multiple lvcmdqs and looking at the series > > > it looks like the vcmdq_alloc allocates a single lvcmdq. Is the plan to > > > dedicate one lvcmdq to per VM? Which means VMs can share a vintf? > > > > VINTF is a vSMMU instance per SMMU. Each VINTF can have multiple > > LVCMDQs. Each vCMDQ is allocated per IOMMUFD_CMD_VCMDQ_ALLOC. In > > other word, VM can issue multiple IOMMUFD_CMD_VCMDQ_ALLOC calls > > for each VTINF/vSMMU. > > > > Ack. I'm just wondering why would a single VM want more than one vCMDQ > per vSMMU? > [...] I guess the only thing on this patch from me was to understand why would a single VM want more than one vCMDQ per vSMMU? (Just curious to know :) ) Apart from that, Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava > > > Thanks > > Nicolin > Thanks, Praan