From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
andersson@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
john.ogness@linutronix.de, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mojha@qti.qualcomm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
konradybcio@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/14] printk: add kmsg_kmemdump_register
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 17:25:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBjYbXJL-GJe4Mh8@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422113156.575971-8-eugen.hristev@linaro.org>
On Tue 2025-04-22 14:31:49, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> Add kmsg_kmemdump_register, which registers prb, log_buf and infos/descs
> to kmemdump.
> This will allow kmemdump to be able to dump specific log buffer areas on
> demand.
>
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -4650,6 +4651,18 @@ int kmsg_dump_register(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmsg_dump_register);
>
> +void kmsg_kmemdump_register(void)
> +{
> + kmemdump_register("log_buf", (void *)log_buf_addr_get(), log_buf_len_get());
> + kmemdump_register("prb", (void *)&prb, sizeof(prb));
> + kmemdump_register("prb", (void *)prb, sizeof(*prb));
This looks strange. "prb" is a pointer to "struct printk_ringbuffer".
It should be enough to register the memory with the structure.
> + kmemdump_register("prb_descs", (void *)_printk_rb_static_descs,
> + sizeof(_printk_rb_static_descs));
> + kmemdump_register("prb_infos", (void *)_printk_rb_static_infos,
> + sizeof(_printk_rb_static_infos));
Also this looks wrong. These are static buffers which are used during
early boot. They might later be replaced by dynamically allocated
buffers when a bigger buffer is requested by "log_buf_len" command
line parameter.
I think that we need to register the memory of the structure
and 3 more buffers. See how the bigger buffer is allocated in
setup_log_buf().
I would expect something like:
unsigned int descs_count;
unsigned long data_size;
descs_count = 2 << prb->desc_ring.count_bits;
data_size = 2 << prb->data_ring.size_bits;
kmemdump_register("prb", (void *)prb, sizeof(*prb));
kmemdump_register("prb_descs", (void *)prb->desc_ring->descs,
descs_count * sizeof(struct prb_desc));
kmemdump_register("prb_infos", (void *)prb->desc_ring->infos,
descs_count * sizeof(struct printk_info));
kmemdump_register("prb_data", (void *)prb->data_ring->data, data_size);
But I wonder if this is enough. The current crash dump code also needs
to export the format of the used structures, see
log_buf_vmcoreinfo_setup().
Is the CONFIG_VMCORE_INFO code shared with the kmemdump, please?
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmsg_kmemdump_register);
> +
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 11:31 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] introduce kmemdump Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] Documentation: add kmemdump Eugen Hristev
2025-05-09 17:31 ` Trilok Soni
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] kmemdump: introduce kmemdump Eugen Hristev
2025-05-09 22:38 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] kmemdump: introduce qcom-md backend driver Eugen Hristev
2025-05-09 23:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] soc: qcom: smem: add minidump device Eugen Hristev
2025-05-07 16:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] Documentation: kmemdump: add section for coreimage ELF Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] kmemdump: add coreimage ELF layer Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] printk: add kmsg_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-05-05 15:25 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2025-05-05 15:51 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-05-06 7:24 ` Petr Mladek
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add kmsg registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] genirq: add irq_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-05-07 10:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-07 10:27 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-13 14:33 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-13 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-16 10:12 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-17 8:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add irq registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] panic: add panic_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add panic registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: add sched_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add sched registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-23 7:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/14] introduce kmemdump Trilok Soni
2025-05-07 16:54 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-05-09 15:19 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-02 8:46 ` Eugen Hristev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBjYbXJL-GJe4Mh8@localhost.localdomain \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=eugen.hristev@linaro.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mojha@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).