From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0D92BCF5D; Thu, 22 May 2025 19:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747940961; cv=none; b=iNTjPVVFY5IC88tMjq1AIjzE+ILSxlyaETiSDnJ8IEmkxMmeZjZW8Fpzl5GPept7/+RCpFZrrYJ6GUyPHdZOYtMT1u8JNeCYwTMnEAdGs2s61+oaxtjhCSzf5eFO+0ha2PqVJwvrtx1fjyKX/T5WW4w7X0cMIhBFhGmfiuixMrA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747940961; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n7njdCjvJ8Bodp29yZcRUsAUKPu8G8E/D8i0PZa75sM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CHMkdWKbzgrVvZkr9ZUHgGi7+1WUhkfhDExwLHKTYHjOeBAxmQy+G9+i90I+cwPyqnfrdj0FmuC1qWpGLZruBvZiD/Z+vAbW/Qd4R+KMQqpbKU1k7sLPI6J/9fkK+1hAcpQY9yNWI+rQ/2o8NpHQgeJ1B3c9gKmSraKEn8kCCwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NhSuu3oi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NhSuu3oi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF437C4CEE4; Thu, 22 May 2025 19:09:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747940961; bh=n7njdCjvJ8Bodp29yZcRUsAUKPu8G8E/D8i0PZa75sM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NhSuu3oiKC9k1Zfj/fyN0A8y0OtsgS0V8pfsvy4B0CYZ1Wlp1d69y7JMYmMUXetER 5F3njuAmsJrLx4MyInj1tlLXCSmgSToxBfr2GjV4blp4NBMg2+gUmxCW2k/LHbou33 xL4bgAz7PbXUvF9ybVbOeHbP7f2UVg0HDIAgowcrqeaamKkZdiE6hkEvNS8nDHws6Q /riekTGibKOcnk2dru90RcrIM9d6ZFKmBHmUG2VjCSIJzCsaVkRJlI5NqJYxmVYStJ XESxT9x1lWNAu8V4VytT2lXLsH7KyXRa713b5CmGWAa6jiryxyijzlWhJdmamvCIKN iVTbpbrIxeIuQ== Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:09:20 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Shashank Balaji Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Jonathan Corbet , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shinya Takumi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched_ext, docs: convert mentions of "CFS" to "fair-class scheduler" Message-ID: References: <20250522-rt-and-cpu-controller-doc-v3-0-483fc9cca591@sony.com> <20250522-rt-and-cpu-controller-doc-v3-2-483fc9cca591@sony.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250522-rt-and-cpu-controller-doc-v3-2-483fc9cca591@sony.com> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:08:13AM +0900, Shashank Balaji wrote: > Mentions of CFS are stale since the fair-class scheduler is implemented using > EEVDF. So, convert such mentions to "fair-class scheduler" to stay > algorithm-name agnostic. > > Signed-off-by: Shashank Balaji Applied to sched_ext/for-6.16. Thanks. -- tejun