From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 17:48:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDgtcAoUci9F9ZmR@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250527-ublk_task_per_io-v7-8-cbdbaf283baa@purestorage.com>
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 05:01:31PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> Explain the restrictions imposed on ublk servers in two cases:
> 1. When UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON is set (current ublk_drv)
> 2. When UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON is not set (legacy)
>
> Remove most references to per-queue daemons, as the new
> UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON feature renders that concept obsolete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 23:01 [PATCH v7 0/8] ublk: decouple server threads from ublk_queues/hctxs Uday Shankar
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon Uday Shankar
2025-05-28 18:25 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-29 9:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-29 15:37 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-29 15:39 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: plumb q_id in io_uring user_data Uday Shankar
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: tie sqe allocation to io instead of queue Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 9:45 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: lift queue initialization out of thread Uday Shankar
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: move per-thread data out of ublk_queue Uday Shankar
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] selftests: ublk: kublk: decouple ublk_queues from ublk server threads Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 9:47 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] selftests: ublk: add test for per io daemons Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 9:47 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-27 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON Uday Shankar
2025-05-28 18:25 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-29 9:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDgtcAoUci9F9ZmR@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).