From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/9] ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 10:05:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDkSXliGj_syKKsr@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529-ublk_task_per_io-v8-1-e9d3b119336a@purestorage.com>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 05:47:10PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> Currently, ublk_drv associates to each hardware queue (hctx) a unique
> task (called the queue's ubq_daemon) which is allowed to issue
> COMMIT_AND_FETCH commands against the hctx. If any other task attempts
> to do so, the command fails immediately with EINVAL. When considered
> together with the block layer architecture, the result is that for each
> CPU C on the system, there is a unique ublk server thread which is
> allowed to handle I/O submitted on CPU C. This can lead to suboptimal
> performance under imbalanced load generation. For an extreme example,
> suppose all the load is generated on CPUs mapping to a single ublk
> server thread. Then that thread may be fully utilized and become the
> bottleneck in the system, while other ublk server threads are totally
> idle.
>
> This issue can also be addressed directly in the ublk server without
> kernel support by having threads dequeue I/Os and pass them around to
> ensure even load. But this solution requires inter-thread communication
> at least twice for each I/O (submission and completion), which is
> generally a bad pattern for performance. The problem gets even worse
> with zero copy, as more inter-thread communication would be required to
> have the buffer register/unregister calls to come from the correct
> thread.
>
> Therefore, address this issue in ublk_drv by allowing each I/O to have
> its own daemon task. Two I/Os in the same queue are now allowed to be
> serviced by different daemon tasks - this was not possible before.
> Imbalanced load can then be balanced across all ublk server threads by
> having the ublk server threads issue FETCH_REQs in a round-robin manner.
> As a small toy example, consider a system with a single ublk device
> having 2 queues, each of depth 4. A ublk server having 4 threads could
> issue its FETCH_REQs against this device as follows (where each entry is
> the qid,tag pair that the FETCH_REQ targets):
>
> ublk server thread: T0 T1 T2 T3
> 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3
> 1,3 1,0 1,1 1,2
>
> This setup allows for load that is concentrated on one hctx/ublk_queue
> to be spread out across all ublk server threads, alleviating the issue
> described above.
>
> Add the new UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON feature to ublk_drv, which ublk servers
> can use to essentially test for the presence of this change and tailor
> their behavior accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
> Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 23:47 [PATCH v8 0/9] ublk: decouple server threads from ublk_queues/hctxs Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] ublk: have a per-io daemon instead of a per-queue daemon Uday Shankar
2025-05-30 1:33 ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-30 2:05 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] selftests: ublk: kublk: plumb q_id in io_uring user_data Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] selftests: ublk: kublk: tie sqe allocation to io instead of queue Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] selftests: ublk: kublk: lift queue initialization out of thread Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] selftests: ublk: kublk: move per-thread data out of ublk_queue Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] selftests: ublk: kublk: decouple ublk_queues from ublk server threads Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] selftests: ublk: add functional test for per io daemons Uday Shankar
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] selftests: ublk: add stress " Uday Shankar
2025-05-30 2:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-05-29 23:47 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] Documentation: ublk: document UBLK_F_PER_IO_DAEMON Uday Shankar
2025-05-30 13:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/9] ublk: decouple server threads from ublk_queues/hctxs Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDkSXliGj_syKKsr@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox