linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: Remove support for use_carrier = 0
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:10:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFDAkS3VUgHwxxr6@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1922517.1750109336@famine>

On 06/16, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	 Remove the ability to disable use_carrier in bonding, and remove
> all code related to the old link state check that utilizes ethtool or
> ioctl to determine the link state of an interface in a bond.
> 
> 	To avoid acquiring RTNL many times per second, bonding's miimon
> link monitor inspects link state under RCU, but not under RTNL.  However,
> ethtool implementations in drivers may sleep, and therefore the ethtool or
> ioctl strategy is unsuitable for use with calls into driver ethtool
> functions.
> 
> 	The use_carrier option was introduced in 2003, to provide
> backwards compatibility for network device drivers that did not support
> the then-new netif_carrier_ok/on/off system.  Today, device drivers are
> expected to support netif_carrier_*, and the use_carrier backwards
> compatibility logic is no longer necessary.
> 
> 	Bonding now always behaves as if use_carrier=1, which relies on
> netif_carrier_ok() to determine the link state of interfaces.  This has
> been the default setting for use_carrier since its introduction.  For
> backwards compatibility, the option itself remains, but may only be set to
> 1, and queries will always return 1.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c48ea38ca27d150063@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c48ea38ca27d150063
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000eb54bf061cfd666a@google.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240718122017.d2e33aaac43a.I10ab9c9ded97163aef4e4de10985cd8f7de60d28@changeid/
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aEt6LvBMwUMxmUyx@mini-arch
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

Maybe better to target 'net' with the following?
Fixes: f7a11cba0ed7 ("bonding: hold ops lock around get_link")

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-16 21:28 [PATCH net-next] bonding: Remove support for use_carrier = 0 Jay Vosburgh
2025-06-17  1:10 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-06-17  2:21   ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-06-17 17:48     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-06-17  5:57 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-06-17 17:56   ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-06-17 12:01 ` Tonghao Zhang
2025-06-17 18:01   ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-08-04 15:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFDAkS3VUgHwxxr6@mini-arch \
    --to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).