From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: Remove support for use_carrier = 0
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:48:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFGqZGvSSEfR-sDi@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1934950.1750126872@famine>
On 06/16, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On 06/16, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> Remove the ability to disable use_carrier in bonding, and remove
> >> all code related to the old link state check that utilizes ethtool or
> >> ioctl to determine the link state of an interface in a bond.
> >>
> >> To avoid acquiring RTNL many times per second, bonding's miimon
> >> link monitor inspects link state under RCU, but not under RTNL. However,
> >> ethtool implementations in drivers may sleep, and therefore the ethtool or
> >> ioctl strategy is unsuitable for use with calls into driver ethtool
> >> functions.
> >>
> >> The use_carrier option was introduced in 2003, to provide
> >> backwards compatibility for network device drivers that did not support
> >> the then-new netif_carrier_ok/on/off system. Today, device drivers are
> >> expected to support netif_carrier_*, and the use_carrier backwards
> >> compatibility logic is no longer necessary.
> >>
> >> Bonding now always behaves as if use_carrier=1, which relies on
> >> netif_carrier_ok() to determine the link state of interfaces. This has
> >> been the default setting for use_carrier since its introduction. For
> >> backwards compatibility, the option itself remains, but may only be set to
> >> 1, and queries will always return 1.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c48ea38ca27d150063@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> >> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c48ea38ca27d150063
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000eb54bf061cfd666a@google.com/
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240718122017.d2e33aaac43a.I10ab9c9ded97163aef4e4de10985cd8f7de60d28@changeid/
> >> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aEt6LvBMwUMxmUyx@mini-arch
> >> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
> >
> >Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> >
> >Maybe better to target 'net' with the following?
> >Fixes: f7a11cba0ed7 ("bonding: hold ops lock around get_link")
>
> I targeted net-next and left the Fixes: tag off on purpose.
>
> First, the bug this nominally fixes is many years old, and
> wasn't introduced by f7a11cba0ed7.
>
> More importantly, though, this patch is removing functionality
> that someone theoretically could be relying on, and I don't think such
> removals should happen in the middle of a stable series. The default
> setting for use_carrier (i.e., using netif_carrier) will never hit the
> issue in practice, so the exposure seems to be minimal for common use.
SG, especially assuming that use_carrier has a default of 1 (so the
issue should not appear in most/default setups).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-16 21:28 [PATCH net-next] bonding: Remove support for use_carrier = 0 Jay Vosburgh
2025-06-17 1:10 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-06-17 2:21 ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-06-17 17:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-06-17 5:57 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-06-17 17:56 ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-06-17 12:01 ` Tonghao Zhang
2025-06-17 18:01 ` Jay Vosburgh
2025-08-04 15:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFGqZGvSSEfR-sDi@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).