From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f52.google.com (mail-qv1-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9870429992A for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 19:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751571627; cv=none; b=iPgFYyytjYcz+j1reBvIZHPPC8j1klIDQpgSCqC/u07SUJ0G2bkxosbFFuN0VOGm2BoTYQ5ZJv1WlV3oDwgb1GfCHd2BYvUQ+Nj3gAnTjG8zO04aB6LLFt5Nm8InTEGzK+7PRmGBIHSb4EHond+mn5MEiwtihoBxkiF4tFfzSdg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751571627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wjAihhlgIFoKBph/30BdSuaRV45zLLu2FTAyTGC63U0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oKcuyT7CGaWB7clSocJmXXX+mCzdn9FFDmsNkDYyQ0nU15YCsN3y3HWl8O7YvpAHj/y52EofspU+gz07lLFLCFBP1uTLpapa6o5IzKMKMn/cJWJ60NNBdhaMOrXnJQ+7gXY1fiEkYG4LG7O4mAT+p+EhK86Y9BbcAh1QO6M1WI4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gourry.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gourry.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gourry.net header.i=@gourry.net header.b=tIwK+dhj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gourry.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gourry.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gourry.net header.i=@gourry.net header.b="tIwK+dhj" Received: by mail-qv1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6fae04a3795so3024566d6.3 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2025 12:40:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gourry.net; s=google; t=1751571624; x=1752176424; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Z5JiRVjpCDIQ2FImaZDAlexoOFjZvW0CINutA6RTJCI=; b=tIwK+dhjNysjyhsEaEO+QTBWm9yc/pmUIcdB5wWstIq0vtM6QzFiINXLWi5BD2ZsjY PuYwFGL/Rg7b38rDWLx1dTyX4fiPz4OLv7lZ5pnTcKG+aLjnjhcwvtCnyi/51ES7/7KK KT6ol/9XNPXtm1Ue6nk1zb82RiQxknwW9eSYFEk0vHxTKTaMD1AEBYTtir+5kEyrieCm SRdo+gPGK5hNQzI5PPrsncNDUNoH9uIc3s/9vUhOYk1wku/dQ3i9yobIeiCwab8kvPIp TeGeHYt3uiG9MhSHFpl+QYEhP4Wb1TbvC8NahY5AAvwvos/oQPzam1kTrsvEzbQMPwLn oUpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751571624; x=1752176424; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Z5JiRVjpCDIQ2FImaZDAlexoOFjZvW0CINutA6RTJCI=; b=k0loQbVFwQDIh/mFkkxC3L/R8IhqTY84K36abOsFkxaxtYHKKzasPICVECIeqvy+RI SYj0HMwADDfYqxireUG2pOcM+LC6hUIgk5HFLSM8ePPUetmSHkhuNNgUDwJMkrYKLE3b PLgZycSur9na12A5V4lhq3a/wI2rb9m2TcKo5mxv2gEE+etgni+9fGQY6Saotldd1Uqo mxRGj83G/vddqdaVjjwIhJBq1o1fg+lz7duIRefj9ipewHZHQJuyMuAV44OxdFLyEYqK QCJQ4ir2i3v0Ofmph6Bod/tDRedYtuFBwhQO72WLx0Be/07QOTu/ml8428EHhf2tDfWE 3M5g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVmAzHCmA0+OAXUhnVyadHIxMs0d4IutNUySYNdWNaKViU0TJ5SEZYxKyNUujRBsioKqjSld+4+l1E=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHB/M1mjEdV+b+CA180yppoaOb75DLwY80ksYFSs6h+sxeQcii Snu3nNX030JWIFKGUgw1pXaxcAYIWUF+jDlALJo7APIhncDbL6mcINwt7t4WvhN7Fqs= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctj+jXTyqP+httvmQGmOdO7V66iL4f5N7QiRE+KuEtQhayR3BXf9HuURRHL4OA oiYRua5PJ7uSuXfWvTcql0TNKWUTrnA9ykS4HsT2zQ3PnC8LH/hBVeyXqZRxIdNTC618n0Fsj6a xHeSs2xJGAYN9Z8AXDmkz0pWoHl+5dEVBcDBII9GNBz5GELwwuiuT/UBU39vmiQ/OlMw3Xz60Hf A1CTRLVV+M2JdXf+Qnc7Qet7vnFch5lSk2LlcRMvdfDVvb4LJty/o8tzUbdZMBXhe7cdlGlpdjr eOsPKP6arQi0VQcZitsLTdyKpEYUCyCx6GmZREU/rcz7LIqw2GF+Zm3vTtECA5aIwtjRTFW4jV1 X1P/t91CHyp2tzHA0qIOQNItm+LP0j7GtQnrytW89bA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtokJzW6Y7SnAkO7fHIQj00qi7TbnLaOfijw/VLKAWWQHbBebWsqlSHWpM0Ffk/Tm8g67+Iw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:dcd:b0:6f5:3cae:920f with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-702b1b376ffmr133762066d6.27.1751571624342; Thu, 03 Jul 2025 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F (pool-96-255-20-42.washdc.ftas.verizon.net. [96.255.20.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-702c4d5ad73sm2155396d6.92.2025.07.03.12.40.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Jul 2025 12:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 15:40:21 -0400 From: Gregory Price To: Dave Jiang Cc: "Fabio M. De Francesco" , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Jonathan Cameron , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , Ira Weiny , Dan Williams , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cxl: docs/driver-api/conventions resolve conflicts btw CFMWS, LMH, ED Message-ID: References: <20250623152923.1048525-1-fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 08:23:57AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > On 6/23/25 12:19 PM, Gregory Price wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > >> Add documentation on how to resolve conflicts between CXL Fixed Memory > >> Windows, Platform Memory Holes, and Endpoint Decoders. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco > > > > I won't block a doc update on a suggestion so > > > > Reviewed-by: Gregory Price > > > >> +Platform Firmware (BIOS) might reserve part of physical addresses below > >> +4 GB (e.g., the Low Memory Hole that describes PCIe memory space for MMIO > >> +or a requirement for the greater than 8 way interleave CXL regions starting > >> +at address 0). In that case the Window Size value cannot be anymore > >> +constrained to the NIW * 256 MB above-mentioned rule. > > > > It might be nice to have a diagram that explains this visually, as it's > > difficult for me to understand the implications through words alone... > > +1 on request for diagram to explain. We should try to document this issue as clearly as possible. Thank you. > At the very least, it would be nice to have an explicitly example that explains the expected cfmws/decoder configurations that are valid but "technically" violate the spec I *think* this basically boils down to "CFMWS size is not aligned, but all the decoders it targets are"? If I understand this correctly? > > > > which is likely why the conflict exists in the first place :] > > > > ~Gregory >