From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
dvyukov@google.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
pankaj.gupta@amd.com, leitao@debian.org, kaleshsingh@google.com,
maz@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
james.morse@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io, david@redhat.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kasan/hw-tags: introduce kasan.store_only option
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:44:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ9yFZ0aobVUPDip@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJ9OA/cHk1iFUPyH@e129823.arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 04:10:59PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > > Like we do in mte_enable_kernel_asymm(), if the feature is not available
> > > just fall back to checking both reads and writes in the chosen
> > > async/sync/asymm way. You can add some pr_info() to inform the user of
> > > the chosen kasan mode. It's really mostly an performance choice.
> >
> > But MTE_STORE_ONLY is defined as a SYSTEM_FEATURE.
> > This means that when it is called from kasan_init_hw_tags_cpu(),
> > the store_only mode is never set in system_capability,
> > so it cannot be checked using cpus_have_cap().
> >
> > Although the MTE_STORE_ONLY capability is verified by
> > directly reading the ID register (seems ugly),
> > my concern is the potential for an inconsistent state across CPUs.
> >
> > For example, in the case of ASYMM, which is a BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
> > all CPUs operate in the same mode —
> > if ASYMM is not supported, either
> > all CPUs run in synchronous mode, or all run in asymmetric mode.
> >
> > However, for MTE_STORE_ONLY, CPUs that support the feature will run in store-only mode,
> > while those that do not will run with full checking for all operations.
> >
> > If we want to enable MTE_STORE_ONLY in kasan_init_hw_tags_cpu(),
> > I believe it should be reclassified as a BOOT_CPU_FEATURE.x
> > Otherwise, the cpu_enable_mte_store_only() function should still be called
> > as the enable callback for the MTE_STORE_ONLY feature.
> > In that case, kasan_enable_store_only() should be invoked (remove late init),
> > and if it returns an error, stop_machine() should be called to disable
> > the STORE_ONLY feature on all other CPUs
> > if any CPU is found to lack support for MTE_STORE_ONLY.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
Good point.
> So, IMHO like the ASYMM feature, it would be good to change
> MTE_STORE_ONLY as BOOT_CPU_FEATURE.
> That would makes everything as easiler and clear.
Yeah, let's do this. If people mix different features, we'll revisit at
that time. The asymmetric tag checking is also a boot CPU feature.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 17:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] introduce kasan.store_only option in hw-tags Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kasan/hw-tags: introduce kasan.store_only option Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-14 5:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-08-14 8:51 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-15 11:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-15 11:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-15 13:51 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-15 15:10 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-15 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-08-15 14:47 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-15 17:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kasan: apply store-only mode in kasan kunit testcases Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-14 5:04 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-08-14 11:13 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-15 6:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-08-15 8:06 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ9yFZ0aobVUPDip@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).