linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 06:31:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNUZ-9wJkhsJXi_n@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-0-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 10:39:19AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> I marked this as a RFC since Stephen asked me in a video call to not
> add a new member to struct clk_core, however I don't see how to do this
> any other way.

Correction: Stephen asked me to not add a new member to struct clk_ops.

Brian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 14:39 [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/12] clk: add kernel docs for struct clk_core Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/12] clk: test: convert constants to use HZ_PER_MHZ Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_div for a mock divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_gate for a mock gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/12] clk: test: introduce helper to create a mock mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a gate/mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/12] clk: add support for v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/12] clk: test: introduce negotiate_rates() op for clk_dummy and clk_dummy_div Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/12] clk: test: update divider kunit tests for v1 and v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-25 10:31 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2025-09-25 12:14 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Maxime Ripard
2025-09-25 14:20   ` Brian Masney
2025-09-30 11:28     ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-15  0:22       ` Brian Masney
2025-11-21 16:09         ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-21 20:35           ` Brian Masney
2025-12-19  0:03             ` Follow up from Linux Plumbers about my clk rate change talk (was Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests) Brian Masney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNUZ-9wJkhsJXi_n@redhat.com \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).