From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86,fs/resctrl: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:30:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR80HzlVD4OBsFnx@e133380.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa20041b-21e2-488e-88fb-ab49a8e24fb8@arm.com>
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 11:06:32AM +0000, Ben Horgan wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 10/31/25 15:41, Dave Martin wrote:
> > The control value parser for the MB resource currently coerces the
> > memory bandwidth percentage value from userspace to be an exact
> > multiple of the rdt_resource::resctrl_membw::bw_gran parameter.
> >
> > On MPAM systems, this results in somewhat worse-than-worst-case
> > rounding, since the bandwidth granularity advertised to resctrl by the
> > MPAM driver is in general only an approximation to the actual hardware
> > granularity on these systems, and the hardware bandwidth allocation
> > control value is not natively a percentage -- necessitating a further
> > conversion in the resctrl_arch_update_domains() path, regardless of the
> > conversion done at parse time.
> >
> > Allow the arch to provide its own parse-time conversion that is
> > appropriate for the hardware, and move the existing conversion to x86.
> > This will avoid accumulated error from rounding the value twice on MPAM
> > systems.
> >
> > Clarify the documentation, but avoid overly exact promises.
> >
> > Clamping to bw_min and bw_max still feels generic: leave it in the core
> > code, for now.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> >
> Seems sensible and helpful for MPAM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Thanks for taking a look.
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 15:41 [PATCH v2] x86,fs/resctrl: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch Dave Martin
2025-11-10 11:06 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-20 15:30 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2025-11-14 22:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-18 15:47 ` Dave Martin
2025-11-20 3:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-20 17:04 ` Dave Martin
2025-11-20 21:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-20 16:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-20 17:42 ` Dave Martin
2025-11-20 22:01 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aR80HzlVD4OBsFnx@e133380.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).