From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
corbet@lwn.net, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
rppt@kernel.org, xiaqinxin@huawei.com, rdunlap@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] iommu: Add calls for IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 18:44:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTxiefxT08hbUPsd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20e015d7-cb54-4a2a-bf62-a828e10e3126@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:33:20AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 12/11/25 20:59, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > Add calls for the new iommu debug config IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC:
> > - iommu_debug_init: Enable the debug mode if configured by the user.
> > - iommu_debug_map: Track iommu pages mapped, using physical address.
> > - iommu_debug_unmap_begin: Track start of iommu unmap operation, with
> > IOVA and size.
> > - iommu_debug_unmap_end: Track the end of unmap operation, passing the
> > actual unmapped size versus the tracked one at unmap_begin.
> >
> > We have to do the unmap_begin/end as once pages are unmapped we lose
> > the information of the physical address.
> > This is racy, but the API is racy by construction as it uses refcounts
> > and doesn't attempt to lock/synchronize with the IOMMU API as that will
> > be costly, meaning that possibility of false negative exists.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c | 28 +++++++++++++
> > drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 11 ++++-
> > include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c
> > index 4022e9af7f27..1d343421da98 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-debug-pagealloc.c
> > @@ -5,11 +5,15 @@
> > * IOMMU API debug page alloc sanitizer
> > */
> > #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> > #include <linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/page_ext.h>
> > +#include "iommu-priv.h"
> > +
> > static bool needed;
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(iommu_debug_initialized);
> > struct iommu_debug_metadata {
> > atomic_t ref;
> > @@ -25,6 +29,30 @@ struct page_ext_operations page_iommu_debug_ops = {
> > .need = need_iommu_debug,
> > };
> > +void __iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> > + size_t unmapped)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void iommu_debug_init(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!needed)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pr_info("iommu: Debugging page allocations, expect overhead or disable iommu.debug_pagealloc");
> > + static_branch_enable(&iommu_debug_initialized);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init iommu_debug_pagealloc(char *str)
> > {
> > return kstrtobool(str, &needed);
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> > index c95394cd03a7..aaffad5854fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > #define __LINUX_IOMMU_PRIV_H
> > #include <linux/iommu.h>
> > +#include <linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h>
> > #include <linux/msi.h>
> > static inline const struct iommu_ops *dev_iommu_ops(struct device *dev)
> > @@ -65,4 +66,61 @@ static inline int iommufd_sw_msi(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid,
> > struct iommu_attach_handle *handle);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > +
> > +void __iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, phys_addr_t phys,
> > + size_t size);
> > +void __iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size);
> > +void __iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size, size_t unmapped);
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> > + __iommu_debug_map(domain, phys, size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> > + __iommu_debug_unmap_begin(domain, iova, size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> > + size_t unmapped)
> > +{
> > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> > + __iommu_debug_unmap_end(domain, iova, size, unmapped);
> > +}
>
> I am wondering whether it would be better if we move iommu_debug_map()
> to iommu-debug-pagealloc.c,
>
> void iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> {
> if (static_branch_likely(&iommu_debug_initialized))
> __iommu_debug_map(domain, phys, size);
> }
>
> (Does it make sense to use static_branch_likely() here? Normally, people
> who enable CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC would want to use this
> debugging feature. Or not?)
>
> So that ...
This actually was the v1 implementation [1], but Jörg suggested to move
it to a header file as a function call would have an overhead if this
feautre is disabled.
I believe the priority would be to keep the performance overhead minimal
with CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and the commandline disabled, so people
can run with the config in production and only enable the commandline
it to debug problems, without having overhead on the typical case.
>
> > +
> > +void iommu_debug_init(void);
> > +
> > +#else
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_begin(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_unmap_end(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> > + size_t unmapped)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_debug_init(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */
> > +
> > #endif /* __LINUX_IOMMU_PRIV_H */
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index 2ca990dfbb88..01b062575519 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ static int __init iommu_subsys_init(void)
> > if (!nb)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > + iommu_debug_init();
> > +
> > for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iommu_buses); i++) {
> > nb[i].notifier_call = iommu_bus_notifier;
> > bus_register_notifier(iommu_buses[i], &nb[i]);
> > @@ -2562,10 +2564,12 @@ int iommu_map_nosync(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> > }
> > /* unroll mapping in case something went wrong */
> > - if (ret)
> > + if (ret) {
> > iommu_unmap(domain, orig_iova, orig_size - size);
> > - else
> > + } else {
> > trace_map(orig_iova, orig_paddr, orig_size);
> > + iommu_debug_map(domain, orig_paddr, orig_size);
> > + }
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -2627,6 +2631,8 @@ static size_t __iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > pr_debug("unmap this: iova 0x%lx size 0x%zx\n", iova, size);
> > + iommu_debug_unmap_begin(domain, iova, size);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Keep iterating until we either unmap 'size' bytes (or more)
> > * or we hit an area that isn't mapped.
> > @@ -2647,6 +2653,7 @@ static size_t __iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > }
> > trace_unmap(orig_iova, size, unmapped);
> > + iommu_debug_unmap_end(domain, orig_iova, size, unmapped);
> > return unmapped;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h b/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h
> > index 83e64d70bf6c..a439d6815ca1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > #define __LINUX_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_H
> > #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(iommu_debug_initialized);
>
> ... we could make this static?
>
This is not static because of the header usage as mentioned above.
Thanks,
Mostafa
> > extern struct page_ext_operations page_iommu_debug_ops;
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20251003173229.1533640-2-smostafa@google.com/
>
> Thanks,
> baolu
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-12 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 12:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] iommu: Add IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC sanitizer Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] iommu: Add page_ext for IOMMU_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12 2:17 ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-12 18:37 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] iommu: Add calls " Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12 2:33 ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-12 18:44 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] iommu: debug-pagealloc: Track IOMMU pages Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12 2:45 ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] iommu: debug-pagealloc: Check mapped/unmapped kernel memory Mostafa Saleh
2025-12-12 2:51 ` Baolu Lu
2025-12-12 18:47 ` Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTxiefxT08hbUPsd@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaqinxin@huawei.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).