From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Antonio Borneo" <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@kernel.org>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
"Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>, "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Orson Zhai" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srini@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Wilken Gottwalt" <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] hwspinlock: refactor headers into public provider/consumer pair
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:41:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXikZ5wc6bvgRqF6@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aXdCBu6kzdw1NWay@ninjato>
Hi all,
> > > Providers need it, especially the 'priv' member. Consumers won't see it.
> >
> > But can't we make it opaque?
> >
> > We may have getters and setters for the priv member...
>
> I think we could do that.
>
> Two drivers use the bank member, but only for the device
> (lock->bank->dev). That can probably be refactored away, I'd guess.
I am willing to develop this series in the above direction. Before
though, I'd like to know from hwspinlock maintainers if they agree to
this refactoring in general.
Thanks and happy hacking,
Wolfram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-25 18:46 [RFC PATCH 0/4] hwspinlock: refactor headers into public provider/consumer pair Wolfram Sang
2026-01-25 18:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: refactor existing headers into consumer.h Wolfram Sang
2026-01-26 9:59 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] hwspinlock: refactor headers into public provider/consumer pair Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-26 10:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-01-26 10:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-26 10:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-01-27 11:41 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-02-09 11:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-09 11:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-09 16:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-02-09 19:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-09 21:37 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-02-10 7:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-10 10:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-10 15:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-26 10:14 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-01-26 10:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-01-26 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXikZ5wc6bvgRqF6@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=antonio.borneo@foss.st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
--cc=wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox