From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4DD41754; Fri, 20 Feb 2026 14:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771598583; cv=none; b=BVbvr4oDB5SmSuggfrfTdl6L3B5BvyxlV/sQpjTdA52mpoqxoB48hWaCCXpUrVmD5GBB6OwRCaR8AuOwLMTbTFfoNq3h6PFV4LtpryLtlobcAmwo9Gw0mlq7wSq7UNpjqUBxlNJfTLcD9Fd2YngDXZsFJjrikzmEVf7+izW3wdA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771598583; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0IvU0+vL+S0ObfnRnzzuEwfOTQwE5YBDNEIOzu5Ldow=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e07kt5BdmymerEC3jw2k0B9J/RDsW8FiBtOUdfb634HMI/iBfu96QYhfZ5XhXgqyE2nCN5swg77LnK4JozTCoQEsc9fskezzCXqAjscuSq6XLvDgZe2kiPHxgnCe2QKyoi0gRTJOpO4dBh6MGMUswV2fbbjmLlW4df7ynNvKZoE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Cme9t0PH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Cme9t0PH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1771598583; x=1803134583; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0IvU0+vL+S0ObfnRnzzuEwfOTQwE5YBDNEIOzu5Ldow=; b=Cme9t0PHWfZvwBZRbFI7wW9DG8rm/IYXZ62Pxv0QH8ZY+F5Mqu70CrnL hhPpnbLbiYlLfwzs9UoI30Uq2hXBA37ZgeQS8QV3Cy/9+9vDKwphRy4+x mAMqARdg6WkyAQ9oM+h0V8tlZtJ3WBAUvp+UTKNLZ23pc2WD8BveW69zS Zm+2MQmTz/ETnlvbBCOZ3yVEnP5J+YC06wXjJzxxD5ntYGWEY/yoAxWUP sAgmFcwnj8dM/n+VZZSUTfDUfBVLzKwQk4uJWZ4ZTa6zPkY6LT06lrj8m ZAmW5qfObhfXp1x11kDmbRtT6YfNykjJdsrNgmJctfKQmbMEXshSvpHow A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qL5xlh4DSniap2WdrtSQ6A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tSzhXlafQTaHjiaUMX3u5g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11707"; a="72868093" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,302,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="72868093" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Feb 2026 06:43:01 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HsgUCRDKTi6avQlF2oAluw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: n4KTY0IaRtu2t7TIKj10Dg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,302,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="214984483" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.25]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Feb 2026 06:42:59 -0800 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 16:42:56 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Guenter Roeck , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] hwmon (bt1-pvt) Remove not-going-to-be-supported code for Baikal SoC Message-ID: References: <20260220143611.2401353-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260220143611.2401353-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 03:36:11PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > As noticed in the discussion [1] the Baikal SoC and platforms > are not going to be finalized, hence remove stale code. It seems the same message was sent twice. There are no differences at all between them. Please, use the first one https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260220143500.2401057-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko