From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Tobias Schrammm <t.schramm@manjaro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] workqueue: devres: Add device-managed allocate workqueue
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:56:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZwWMiYEvr3DXi3E@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223-workqueue-devm-v1-1-10b3a6087586@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 08:27:29AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Add a Resource-managed version of alloc_workqueue() to fix common
> problem of drivers mixing devm() calls with destroy_workqueue. Such
> naive and discouraged driver approach leads to difficult to debug bugs
> when the driver:
>
> 1. Allocates workqueue in standard way and destroys it in driver
> remove() callback,
> 2. Sets work struct with devm_work_autocancel(),
> 3. Registers interrupt handler with devm_request_threaded_irq().
>
> Which leads to following unbind/removal path:
>
> 1. destroy_workqueue() via driver remove(),
> Any interrupt coming now would still execute the interrupt handler,
> which queues work on destroyed workqueue.
> 2. devm_irq_release(),
> 3. devm_work_drop() -> cancel_work_sync() on destroyed workqueue.
>
> devm_alloc_workqueue() has two benefits:
> 1. Solves above problem of mix-and-match devres and non-devres code in
> driver,
> 2. Simplify any sane drivers which were correctly using
> alloc_workqueue() + devm_add_action_or_reset().
> include/linux/workqueue.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/workqueue.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hmm... We have devm-helpers.h. Why the new one is in workqueue.h?
Can we have some consistency here?
...
> + ptr = devres_alloc(devm_destroy_workqueue, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + va_start(args, max_active);
> + wq = alloc_workqueue(fmt, flags, max_active, args);
> + va_end(args);
> + if (wq) {
> + *ptr = wq;
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> + } else {
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + }
Why not using devm_add_action_or_reset()?
...
> +void devm_destroy_workqueue(struct device *dev, void *res)
> +{
> + destroy_workqueue(*(struct workqueue_struct **)res);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_destroy_workqueue);
Is this going to be used?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 7:27 [PATCH 0/9] workqueue / drivers: Add device-managed allocate workqueue Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] workqueue: devres: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 8:56 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-02-23 10:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 11:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-23 11:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 11:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-23 11:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 12:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-23 13:52 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-02-23 10:36 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-23 10:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 15:42 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-05 20:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] power: supply: cw2015: Free allocated workqueue Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] power: supply: max77705: Free allocated workqueue and fix removal order Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 8:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-23 10:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 11:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] power: supply: mt6370: Simplify with devm_create_singlethread_workqueue Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] power: supply: ipaq_micro: Simplify with devm Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] mfd: ezx-pcap: Drop memory allocation error message Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] mfd: ezx-pcap: Return directly instead of empty gotos Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] mfd: ezx-pcap: Avoid rescheduling after destroying workqueue Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-23 7:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] platform/chrome: cros_usbpd_logger: Simplify with devm Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZwWMiYEvr3DXi3E@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dsankouski@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=t.schramm@manjaro.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox