* [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM="
@ 2026-02-26 21:23 Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0 Thomas Weißschuh
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-02-26 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor, Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt,
Nicolas Schier, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan
Cc: llvm, linux-kbuild, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
Thomas Weißschuh
Some cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
Thomas Weißschuh (2):
Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0
tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=
Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 4 ----
tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f
change-id: 20260226-kbuild-llvm-followup-5ad6253f85c8
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0
2026-02-26 21:23 [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2026-02-26 21:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM= Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-03 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Nicolas Schier
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-02-26 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor, Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt,
Nicolas Schier, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan
Cc: llvm, linux-kbuild, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
Thomas Weißschuh
Since commit 502678b88cb3 ("kbuild: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=")
LLVM=0 generates an error instead of silently behaving unexpectedly.
Drop the now unnecessary note.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
index bc8a283bc44b..441d8786fcbc 100644
--- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ recommend::
PATH=/path/to/llvm/:$PATH make LLVM=-14
-``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether, it will behave like
-``LLVM=1``. If you only wish to use certain LLVM utilities, use their
-respective make variables.
-
The same value used for ``LLVM=`` should be set for each invocation of ``make``
if configuring and building via distinct commands. ``LLVM=`` should also be set
as an environment variable when running scripts that will eventually run
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=
2026-02-26 21:23 [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0 Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2026-02-26 21:23 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-03 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Nicolas Schier
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-02-26 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor, Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt,
Nicolas Schier, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan
Cc: llvm, linux-kbuild, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
Thomas Weißschuh
Since commit 502678b88cb3 ("kbuild: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=")
the regular kbuild rejects unexpected values of LLVM=1 instead of
silently treating them as LLVM=1.
Align the tools build to kbuild.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
There is no formal maintainer for this file.
IMO this change should go through kbuild.
---
tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/scripts/Makefile.include b/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
index b5ecf137febc..41971a68972d 100644
--- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
+++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ ifneq ($(filter %/,$(LLVM)),)
LLVM_PREFIX := $(LLVM)
else ifneq ($(filter -%,$(LLVM)),)
LLVM_SUFFIX := $(LLVM)
+else ifneq ($(LLVM),1)
+$(error Invalid value for LLVM, see Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst)
endif
$(call allow-override,CC,$(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX))
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0 Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2026-02-26 21:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-27 8:10 ` Nicolas Schier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2026-02-26 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh
Cc: Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt, Nicolas Schier,
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, llvm, linux-kbuild, linux-doc,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:23:57PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Since commit 502678b88cb3 ("kbuild: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=")
> LLVM=0 generates an error instead of silently behaving unexpectedly.
>
> Drop the now unnecessary note.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
It might be worth keeping the note about LLVM=0 not being the same as
omitting LLVM altogether, as neither the documentation nor the error
message will say why that is not a valid value. Maybe:
``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether. If you
only wish to use certain LLVM utilities, use their respective make
variables.
I don't feel that strongly about it though. Regardless:
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
> index bc8a283bc44b..441d8786fcbc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ recommend::
>
> PATH=/path/to/llvm/:$PATH make LLVM=-14
>
> -``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether, it will behave like
> -``LLVM=1``. If you only wish to use certain LLVM utilities, use their
> -respective make variables.
> -
> The same value used for ``LLVM=`` should be set for each invocation of ``make``
> if configuring and building via distinct commands. ``LLVM=`` should also be set
> as an environment variable when running scripts that will eventually run
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM= Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2026-02-26 21:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-27 8:08 ` Nicolas Schier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2026-02-26 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh
Cc: Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt, Nicolas Schier,
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, llvm, linux-kbuild, linux-doc,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:23:58PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Since commit 502678b88cb3 ("kbuild: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=")
> the regular kbuild rejects unexpected values of LLVM=1 instead of
> silently treating them as LLVM=1.
>
> Align the tools build to kbuild.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
>
> ---
> There is no formal maintainer for this file.
> IMO this change should go through kbuild.
Ironically I just rejected a tools/ patch going through Kbuild:
https://lore.kernel.org/20260225192505.GC2755225@ax162/
but since there is no formal maintainer, it is the same change done in
Kbuild, and the risk of fallout is much less than that change, I think
we can make an exception and take it.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/scripts/Makefile.include b/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
> index b5ecf137febc..41971a68972d 100644
> --- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
> +++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ ifneq ($(filter %/,$(LLVM)),)
> LLVM_PREFIX := $(LLVM)
> else ifneq ($(filter -%,$(LLVM)),)
> LLVM_SUFFIX := $(LLVM)
> +else ifneq ($(LLVM),1)
> +$(error Invalid value for LLVM, see Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst)
> endif
>
> $(call allow-override,CC,$(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX))
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=
2026-02-26 21:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2026-02-27 8:08 ` Nicolas Schier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Schier @ 2026-02-27 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh, Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling,
Justin Stitt, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, llvm, linux-kbuild,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 02:45:58PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:23:58PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Since commit 502678b88cb3 ("kbuild: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=")
> > the regular kbuild rejects unexpected values of LLVM=1 instead of
> > silently treating them as LLVM=1.
> >
> > Align the tools build to kbuild.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> >
> > ---
> > There is no formal maintainer for this file.
> > IMO this change should go through kbuild.
>
> Ironically I just rejected a tools/ patch going through Kbuild:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/20260225192505.GC2755225@ax162/
>
> but since there is no formal maintainer, it is the same change done in
> Kbuild, and the risk of fallout is much less than that change, I think
> we can make an exception and take it.
+1
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
--
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0
2026-02-26 21:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2026-02-27 8:10 ` Nicolas Schier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Schier @ 2026-02-27 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh, Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling,
Justin Stitt, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, llvm, linux-kbuild,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 02:43:49PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:23:57PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Since commit 502678b88cb3 ("kbuild: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=")
> > LLVM=0 generates an error instead of silently behaving unexpectedly.
> >
> > Drop the now unnecessary note.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
>
> It might be worth keeping the note about LLVM=0 not being the same as
> omitting LLVM altogether, as neither the documentation nor the error
> message will say why that is not a valid value. Maybe:
>
> ``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether. If you
> only wish to use certain LLVM utilities, use their respective make
> variables.
Yeah, I think that would be a good thing to add, too.
W/ or w/o:
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
If nobody complains, I am going to add both patches to kbuild-next
within a few days.
Kind regards,
Nicolas
> I don't feel that strongly about it though. Regardless:
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
> > index bc8a283bc44b..441d8786fcbc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst
> > @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ recommend::
> >
> > PATH=/path/to/llvm/:$PATH make LLVM=-14
> >
> > -``LLVM=0`` is not the same as omitting ``LLVM`` altogether, it will behave like
> > -``LLVM=1``. If you only wish to use certain LLVM utilities, use their
> > -respective make variables.
> > -
> > The same value used for ``LLVM=`` should be set for each invocation of ``make``
> > if configuring and building via distinct commands. ``LLVM=`` should also be set
> > as an environment variable when running scripts that will eventually run
> >
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >
--
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM="
2026-02-26 21:23 [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0 Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM= Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2026-03-03 16:48 ` Nicolas Schier
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Schier @ 2026-03-03 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor, Nick Desaulniers, Bill Wendling, Justin Stitt,
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, Thomas Weißschuh
Cc: Nicolas Schier, llvm, linux-kbuild, linux-doc, linux-kernel
On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 22:23:56 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Some cleanups.
>
>
Applied to kbuild/linux.git (kbuild-for-next), thanks!
[1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0
https://git.kernel.org/kbuild/c/8830b2e5
[2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM=
https://git.kernel.org/kbuild/c/7239ae53
Please look out for regression or issue reports or other follow up
comments, as they may result in the patch/series getting dropped,
reverted or modified (e.g. trailers). Patches applied to a
kbuild-*-unstable branch are accepted pending wider testing in
linux-next and any post-commit review; they will generally be moved
to the main branch (kbuild-next or kbuild-fixes) in a week if no
issues are found.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-03 16:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-26 21:23 [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/llvm: drop note about LLVM=0 Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-27 8:10 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-02-26 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/build: Reject unexpected values for LLVM= Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-26 21:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-27 8:08 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-03-03 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] kbuild: Follow-up to "Reject unexpected values for LLVM=" Nicolas Schier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox