From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476313469FA; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 17:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772214213; cv=none; b=q4j0nqT97M66tsawqbc7Ey3477pmtWzIYRmfYcBo1wXi3kxW5QuyLe0bOEw4KocpbQMVywLBmXMDRN4p7ZfSzRy612nEhRUBE25MJQg6nn21DiIBjRF5EyHHdfLa8Bkd+6WK1utbA1m/BveXxncCc/vjCSQLY/bJ3xvIIQXcfZY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772214213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=un/5i450Ou18z5phpdhmNIyhCrOODsboVnbv4vk4s8A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q1IXk5I4ZSSly2YfTZDiUssguUegDxXqpLtPWcBqma3RgefI+OYCnaGv56gZDF6X+1Bf5fUE1yiL4c0hjmIzVLkKdB2085XWNC0P5GRGIIpSJpD+b0/9cUT9dI/Wx31c/5I94a3rB/swhj+LzJgBe3vj5KjRFTDjcCYXVkHjuKY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ja+EicOx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ja+EicOx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772214212; x=1803750212; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=un/5i450Ou18z5phpdhmNIyhCrOODsboVnbv4vk4s8A=; b=ja+EicOxkor2bR70HVzP5IKUSf5qwlQyLCW1sGneKUvVGWlAYnIBafdc nDlg8pKXHCZt9Y2wCthmcPj1VJlTrKGJeUPUTNQpZ10g1+wCNUGF8K9SK zuphLzfu8aJ97BQFZAiTgaJ/YXEJPnX7Lh4RBHfCZifTWaiEoehcAwsWV 2H9S1zayKq6Fqxwyg2qGYUKMsx+dyisVpMtOQAZW9okLha4dmLp7kfYb3 gqJsj7r+IlfwiDYOTvah3IDFgFNJmGwMFEO4biW+NpLsIDEjjDp3N8b5/ ZtuHH6X732aosuVNRWd1akdfMAExlqu/N9kSfSGy2SMWMcjPlzXeFrz4I Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DbgGeTqoQ6e2lOWgtZYfMQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rC0g4jJuQ+SnF2/jjQHeVg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11714"; a="83633192" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,314,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="83633192" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2026 09:43:31 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0sJ19TptSByz7ucYTWzaHg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vGxg6ccwQ/yhy7aqg6PapA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,314,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="221101117" Received: from egrumbac-mobl6.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.180]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2026 09:43:28 -0800 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 19:43:26 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ammar Mustafa Cc: Alisa-Dariana Roman , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: iio: ad7191: Correct clock configuration Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 12:31:51PM -0500, Ammar Mustafa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:37:41AM -0500, Ammar Mustafa wrote: ... > > When I see such a confusion in the documentation I propose to replace HIGH/LOW > > to active/inactive or asserted/deasserted. > > > > And no need to swap the entries. > > I haven't seen anything in the documentation to believe clksel is > active-low. I agree that assert/deassert would remove this confusion. I > can resend the patch with this change and without the swapped entries. Please, do. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko