From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC283CD8A7 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774021278; cv=none; b=hwU00JxuPEf8SmAlP5hQR7D+lN7+syK9kyKqeSoiSacxmn+6krnPtvrg37h8BpomsdA0Jd1jylQdN+qXnp/+xdQD7pBf9kv9T66y6FM/uhwqpBnRN9AvRsQql8TeuZQeP29D/kB1qC18UYuSbEuMVKjBoLe0A0iRDzq1y6RS5bs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774021278; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7W8Zh+eJcNEP6cSAx/szdWUQ7Euc/dI9gMu3jX8uY4k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cjm/yyKfZMLAjCN8ojQPyERWo1vxn8WovDisA8QUhux7vHIjvIDYMX4uunYx6gvSG3/e4kO8Z6bqEmUsdlcsMPcU+6A76G0cjptNJzi378LTYpE2UGb+2azZPKifuhahCNSsSzcaXPcT2wyQrSG8GUa5AfXP6buXM5/q6l37gzU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=QEVWGRrS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QEVWGRrS" Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-c74280e3468so326781a12.3 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:41:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1774021272; x=1774626072; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zNUDTw6UmasFeJqzydufaazuaNtX8ofv0HS08KI6BZg=; b=QEVWGRrSmxHnKPGQYHSTm35KrVIkNuhUhtVZqtFWsblmKA7DHQKR2rIT2cnJuBmZOG YO+zMiPVsPKIBu8sCHK8QHu4gA3Z2uQD1Joiuah3re1W9fzTkbI0sP/vmhTOABCwfXrc j57B59ZbeaMcOsHpdQ3Yi9z6ovLhQaRZoS+2YyRd5LfJKFXPobwUkRXoRxpwYNFJSuYc iuvXchq3Zl+QqRbQJ7vDLWQbZ5SGVxCnYcpua6E+sa1P78S83QRFjbOWJ+WepF6HmYD6 9DE0jI1Y/JRlhlqdhguZhOkSn64nL6NkhfjyOxAr2KPnnlWBebT+jg24b42YsoY2eNbu qdgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1774021272; x=1774626072; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zNUDTw6UmasFeJqzydufaazuaNtX8ofv0HS08KI6BZg=; b=mj0TzZ5U9gmVryeQrzRIm6tkoNn3Tw4l8nk5U9d3Ir01injE3IOifED+adqVwWneBk Ce+oeCWWav1HBOB7rNNkqsr/xZrlt7hZNXpESn/Hhwox+UH0jAvu6I0/UMnbzmAiywGV IMWvRYQmtPk0pJvI+E6leer1983cWbH143aLwF503hPbQ0yjtc805/8xt1Q1RhasYf+c gNQr7zwghm+Z7l4F3syrXwwIr20agAhAeGzELjzlPmDaVesgpznmVFqrFYomyBpEPm5O 2FmgJJ88yY1ZU0eJ4g+dKh0HHEJRRI6xEkz5l2f3VsX94rWzBFB796vXDy/adavH6dxq GkMw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXYAVFZtxrD6QufInzyiujciUorum/ri44Dzvl/lenThcocFS9L3CWE73hS3AmTITr7jYhueK11Zzw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxyqEH/2LZ9bD61pMASpo/4BvHuNWfEHEu7i5KDBN2AbSC3BYkI 9wZd2ctLkYkSeDhw65Yb7SbCyT9yzYhPfkXKqDlZBMWZlmDmJGjcd1M= X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzy2/EJkQp0gQiXeXuf8+VDcGV6/10akvQ2CFmgMtobJ9H8KQKQYVn8MLhsWUct 0r7ZKQv2cTHtVs/7UkKj5c50ZVIEcZesuHP+37ThpsVUNOUtgSHhlz/SPx5nS+44rJo/qVMX8Ew 0abo67d9r98YbIOv1nFAeb4xSrOt6JAqht1TEzIO/AKvhPjenp0ZgzYMi+cJd4MgdZ0SKoND5ja TS3e17Isv6F1J2GRERCTUEqpahJCguVe6MKLnkvoAL7fc6TIuCeRueiJGIhBJTUzgcRihSy6hGw o01OUTcfY5r6G3RO7NTvmRkFncUK6isolrkqlD3dPhaEzzWWxrZkTQoNmF0Ty6WeQPKMbY6W+1D T5YL88r9fGMqDRApMPvgdY7p5LQCfgDrrvqJpmIu84U1taS27sf6C9PrXb8SzB7NMIrkOMWT31J fJJVsB5nqy+kUY0b66jqFjYt+BJW0IPENPrl2Q5s8opbGBf7hGZ6Y/AEENke+49LFp3+ugHgbxl kxZO5QLgY0vGR0Nbw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:38cf:b0:2ae:47c9:68c4 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b0827f7629mr35987865ad.50.1774021271829; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-76-102-12-149.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [76.102.12.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2b0835429afsm26089295ad.26.2026.03.20.08.41.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:41:10 -0700 From: Stanislav Fomichev To: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" Cc: Stanislav Fomichev , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "horms@kernel.org" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "skhan@linuxfoundation.org" , "andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" , "michael.chan@broadcom.com" , "pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com" , "Nguyen, Anthony L" , "Kitszel, Przemyslaw" , "saeedm@nvidia.com" , "tariqt@nvidia.com" , "mbloch@nvidia.com" , "alexanderduyck@fb.com" , "kernel-team@meta.com" , "johannes@sipsolutions.net" , "sd@queasysnail.net" , "jianbol@nvidia.com" , "dtatulea@nvidia.com" , "mohsin.bashr@gmail.com" , "Keller, Jacob E" , "willemb@google.com" , "skhawaja@google.com" , "bestswngs@gmail.com" , "kees@kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "leon@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/13] net: move promiscuity handling into dev_rx_mode_work Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Stanislav Fomichev , "Loktionov, Aleksandr" , Stanislav Fomichev , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "horms@kernel.org" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "skhan@linuxfoundation.org" , "andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" , "michael.chan@broadcom.com" , "pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com" , "Nguyen, Anthony L" , "Kitszel, Przemyslaw" , "saeedm@nvidia.com" , "tariqt@nvidia.com" , "mbloch@nvidia.com" , "alexanderduyck@fb.com" , "kernel-team@meta.com" , "johannes@sipsolutions.net" , "sd@queasysnail.net" , "jianbol@nvidia.com" , "dtatulea@nvidia.com" , "mohsin.bashr@gmail.com" , "Keller, Jacob E" , "willemb@google.com" , "skhawaja@google.com" , "bestswngs@gmail.com" , "kees@kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "leon@kernel.org" References: <20260320012501.2033548-1-sdf@fomichev.me> <20260320012501.2033548-5-sdf@fomichev.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 03/20, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stanislav Fomichev > > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2026 2:25 AM > > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; > > pabeni@redhat.com; horms@kernel.org; corbet@lwn.net; > > skhan@linuxfoundation.org; andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; > > michael.chan@broadcom.com; pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com; Nguyen, Anthony > > L ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > > ; saeedm@nvidia.com; tariqt@nvidia.com; > > mbloch@nvidia.com; alexanderduyck@fb.com; kernel-team@meta.com; > > johannes@sipsolutions.net; sd@queasysnail.net; jianbol@nvidia.com; > > dtatulea@nvidia.com; sdf@fomichev.me; mohsin.bashr@gmail.com; Keller, > > Jacob E ; willemb@google.com; > > skhawaja@google.com; bestswngs@gmail.com; Loktionov, Aleksandr > > ; kees@kernel.org; linux- > > doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired- > > lan@lists.osuosl.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > wireless@vger.kernel.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; > > leon@kernel.org > > Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 04/13] net: move promiscuity handling into > > dev_rx_mode_work > > > > Move unicast promiscuity tracking into dev_rx_mode_work so it runs > > under netdev_ops_lock instead of under the addr_lock spinlock. This is > > required because __dev_set_promiscuity calls dev_change_rx_flags and > > __dev_notify_flags, both of which may need to sleep. > > > > Change ASSERT_RTNL() to netdev_ops_assert_locked() in > > __dev_set_promiscuity, netif_set_allmulti and __dev_change_flags since > > these are now called from the work queue under the ops lock. > > > > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev > > --- > > Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst | 4 ++ > > net/core/dev.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++------- > > - > > 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst > > b/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst > > index dc83d78d3b27..5cdaa1a3dcc8 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst > > @@ -298,6 +298,10 @@ struct net_device synchronization rules > > Notes: Sleepable version of ndo_set_rx_mode. Receives snapshots > > of the unicast and multicast address lists. > > > > +ndo_change_rx_flags: > > + Synchronization: rtnl_lock() semaphore. In addition, netdev > > instance > > + lock if the driver implements queue management or shaper API. > > + > > ndo_setup_tc: > > ``TC_SETUP_BLOCK`` and ``TC_SETUP_FT`` are running under NFT > > locks > > (i.e. no ``rtnl_lock`` and no device instance lock). The rest > > of diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index > > fedc423306fc..fc5c9b14faa0 100644 > > --- a/net/core/dev.c > > +++ b/net/core/dev.c > > @@ -9574,7 +9574,7 @@ static int __dev_set_promiscuity(struct > > net_device *dev, int inc, bool notify) > > kuid_t uid; > > kgid_t gid; > > > > - ASSERT_RTNL(); > > + netdev_ops_assert_locked(dev); > Can you explain why do you add new hard precondition of ops lock must be held? The context is that in f792709e0baa ("selftests: net: validate team flags propagation") I had to add locking around NETDEV_CHANGE notifiers and add that ugly `if (notify) netdev_ops_assert_locked` check. After this patch I believe we are consistently calling __dev_set_promiscuity with the ops lock (for ops locked netdev), so we can cleanup this enforcement part. > > promiscuity = dev->promiscuity + inc; > > if (promiscuity == 0) { > > @@ -9610,16 +9610,8 @@ static int __dev_set_promiscuity(struct > > net_device *dev, int inc, bool notify) > > > > dev_change_rx_flags(dev, IFF_PROMISC); > > } > > ... > > > __hw_addr_init(&uc_snap); > > @@ -9704,16 +9720,29 @@ static void dev_rx_mode_work(struct > > work_struct *work) > > if (!err) > > err = __hw_addr_list_snapshot(&mc_ref, &dev->mc, > > dev->addr_len); > > - netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev); > > > > if (err) { > > netdev_WARN(dev, "failed to sync uc/mc > > addresses\n"); > > __hw_addr_flush(&uc_snap); > > __hw_addr_flush(&uc_ref); > > __hw_addr_flush(&mc_snap); > > + netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev); > > goto out; > > } > > > > + promisc_inc = dev_uc_promisc_update(dev); > > + > > + netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev); > > + } else { > > + netif_addr_lock_bh(dev); > > + promisc_inc = dev_uc_promisc_update(dev); > > + netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev); > > + } > > + > > + if (promisc_inc) > > + __dev_set_promiscuity(dev, promisc_inc, false); > But it's being called here without any netdev_lock_ops(dev) ? We have the following at the start of dev_rx_mode_work: rtnl_lock(); netdev_lock_ops(dev); Or am I looking at something else?