Re: [PATCH V10 00/10] famfs: port into fuse

David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-15T08:16:53Z

On 4/15/26 00:20, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 11:57:40AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>
>>> I very strongly object to making this a prerequisite to merging. This
>>> is an untested idea that will certainly delay us by at least a couple
>>> of merge windows when products are shipping now, and the existing approach
>>> has been in circulation for a long time. It is TOO LATE!!!!!!
>>
> ...
>>
>> That said, you're clearly pissed at the goalposts changing yet again,
>> and that's really not fair that we collectively keep moving them.
>>
>
> This seems a bit more than moving a goalpost.
>
> We're now gating working software, for real working hardware, on a novel,
> unproven BPF ops structure that controls page table mappings on page table
> faults which would be used by exactly 1 user : FAMFS.

Are MM people on board with even letting BPF do that? Honest question,
if someone has a pointer to how that should work, that would be appreciated.

--
Cheers,

David