On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 10:35:20AM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:

[...]

> I don't know how heavy/long the process is to submit this kind of RFC
> update, but your point makes it sound like it makes more sense to just
> go directly for the proper way, ie adding the conformance group and then
> adding those new ops in there, rather than updating the kernel doc as my
> series is proposing, and then later reverting to a proper conformance
> group.

Hey Alexis,

Apologies for the delay. My email filter was broken so I only just saw
this. Yes, this would be my suggestion. I can send out a patch that gets
this started later this week.

Thanks,
David