Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	dmatlack@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	 skhawaja@google.com, graf@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of files per session
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:40:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah2Z0R9uI7bNaUi5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2vxzbjdufirq.fsf@kernel.org>

On 06-01 16:16, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Sat, May 30 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> 
> > To remove the fixed limit on the number of preserved files per session,
> > transition the file metadata serialization from a single contiguous
> > memory block to a chain of linked blocks.
> >
> > Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/kho/abi/luo.h      |  13 +--
> >  kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c     | 144 +++++++++++++++----------------
> >  kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h |   6 +-
> >  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kho/abi/luo.h b/include/linux/kho/abi/luo.h
> > index 79758d92ed5f..16df550ef143 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kho/abi/luo.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kho/abi/luo.h
> > @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@
> >   *
> >   *   - struct luo_session_ser:
> >   *     Metadata for a single session, including its name and a physical pointer
> > - *     to another preserved memory block containing an array of
> > - *     `struct luo_file_ser` for all files in that session.
> > + *     to the first `struct kho_block_header_ser` for all files in that session.
> > + *     Multiple blocks are linked via the `next` field in the header.
> >   *
> >   *   - struct luo_file_ser:
> >   *     Metadata for a single preserved file. Contains the `compatible` string to
> > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
> >   * The LUO state is registered under this KHO entry name.
> >   */
> >  #define LUO_KHO_ENTRY_NAME	"LUO"
> > -#define LUO_COMPAT_BASE		"luo-v3"
> > +#define LUO_COMPAT_BASE		"luo-v4"
> >  #define LUO_ABI_COMPATIBLE	LUO_COMPAT_BASE "-" KHO_BLOCK_ABI_COMPATIBLE
> >  #define LUO_ABI_COMPAT_LEN	ALIGN(sizeof(LUO_ABI_COMPATIBLE), 8)
> >  
> > @@ -103,9 +103,10 @@ struct luo_file_ser {
> >  
> >  /**
> >   * struct luo_file_set_ser - Represents the serialized metadata for file set
> > - * @files:   The physical address of a contiguous memory block that holds
> > - *           the serialized state of files (array of luo_file_ser) in this file
> > - *           set.
> > + * @files:   The physical address of the first `struct kho_block_header_ser`.
> > + *           This structure is the header for a block of memory containing
> > + *           an array of `struct luo_file_ser` entries. Multiple blocks are
> > + *           linked via the `next` field in the header.
> >   * @count:   The total number of files that were part of this session during
> >   *           serialization. Used for iteration and validation during
> >   *           restoration.
> > diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> > index 9eec07a9e9fc..a445b1950ca7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> > +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> > @@ -118,11 +118,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(luo_file_handler_list);
> >  /* Keep track of files being preserved by LUO */
> >  static DEFINE_XARRAY(luo_preserved_files);
> >  
> > -/* 2 4K pages, give space for 128 files per file_set */
> > -#define LUO_FILE_PGCNT		2ul
> > -#define LUO_FILE_MAX							\
> > -	((LUO_FILE_PGCNT << PAGE_SHIFT) / sizeof(struct luo_file_ser))
> > -
> >  /**
> >   * struct luo_file - Represents a single preserved file instance.
> >   * @fh:            Pointer to the &struct liveupdate_file_handler that manages
> > @@ -174,39 +169,6 @@ struct luo_file {
> >  	u64 token;
> >  };
> >  
> > -static int luo_alloc_files_mem(struct luo_file_set *file_set)
> > -{
> > -	size_t size;
> > -	void *mem;
> > -
> > -	if (file_set->files)
> > -		return 0;
> > -
> > -	WARN_ON_ONCE(file_set->count);
> > -
> > -	size = LUO_FILE_PGCNT << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -	mem = kho_alloc_preserve(size);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(mem))
> > -		return PTR_ERR(mem);
> > -
> > -	file_set->files = mem;
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void luo_free_files_mem(struct luo_file_set *file_set)
> > -{
> > -	/* If file_set has files, no need to free preservation memory */
> > -	if (file_set->count)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	if (!file_set->files)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	kho_unpreserve_free(file_set->files);
> > -	file_set->files = NULL;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static unsigned long luo_get_id(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> >  				struct file *file)
> >  {
> > @@ -276,16 +238,15 @@ int luo_preserve_file(struct luo_file_set *file_set, u64 token, int fd)
> >  	if (luo_token_is_used(file_set, token))
> >  		return -EEXIST;
> >  
> > -	if (file_set->count == LUO_FILE_MAX)
> > -		return -ENOSPC;
> > +	err = kho_block_grow(&file_set->block_set, file_set->count);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> >  
> >  	file = fget(fd);
> > -	if (!file)
> > -		return -EBADF;
> > -
> > -	err = luo_alloc_files_mem(file_set);
> > -	if (err)
> > -		goto  err_fput;
> > +	if (!file) {
> > +		err = -EBADF;
> > +		goto err_shrink;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	err = -ENOENT;
> >  	down_read(&luo_register_rwlock);
> > @@ -300,7 +261,7 @@ int luo_preserve_file(struct luo_file_set *file_set, u64 token, int fd)
> >  
> >  	/* err is still -ENOENT if no handler was found */
> >  	if (err)
> > -		goto err_free_files_mem;
> > +		goto err_fput;
> >  
> >  	err = xa_insert(&luo_preserved_files, luo_get_id(fh, file),
> >  			file, GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -343,10 +304,10 @@ int luo_preserve_file(struct luo_file_set *file_set, u64 token, int fd)
> >  	xa_erase(&luo_preserved_files, luo_get_id(fh, file));
> >  err_module_put:
> >  	module_put(fh->ops->owner);
> > -err_free_files_mem:
> > -	luo_free_files_mem(file_set);
> >  err_fput:
> >  	fput(file);
> > +err_shrink:
> > +	kho_block_shrink(&file_set->block_set, file_set->count);
> >  
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > @@ -392,13 +353,14 @@ void luo_file_unpreserve_files(struct luo_file_set *file_set)
> >  
> >  		list_del(&luo_file->list);
> >  		file_set->count--;
> > +		kho_block_shrink(&file_set->block_set, file_set->count);
> >  
> >  		fput(luo_file->file);
> >  		mutex_destroy(&luo_file->mutex);
> >  		kfree(luo_file);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	luo_free_files_mem(file_set);
> > +	kho_block_destroy(&file_set->block_set);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int luo_file_freeze_one(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> > @@ -454,7 +416,7 @@ static void __luo_file_unfreeze(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> >  		luo_file_unfreeze_one(file_set, luo_file);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	memset(file_set->files, 0, LUO_FILE_PGCNT << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +	kho_block_set_clear(&file_set->block_set);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -493,19 +455,23 @@ static void __luo_file_unfreeze(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> >  int luo_file_freeze(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> >  		    struct luo_file_set_ser *file_set_ser)
> >  {
> > -	struct luo_file_ser *file_ser = file_set->files;
> >  	struct luo_file *luo_file;
> > +	struct kho_block_it it;
> >  	int err;
> > -	int i;
> >  
> >  	if (!file_set->count)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > -	if (WARN_ON(!file_ser))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +	kho_block_it_init(&it, &file_set->block_set);
> >  
> > -	i = 0;
> >  	list_for_each_entry(luo_file, &file_set->files_list, list) {
> > +		struct luo_file_ser *file_ser = kho_block_it_next(&it);
> > +
> > +		if (!file_ser) {
> > +			err = -ENOSPC;
> > +			goto err_unfreeze;
> > +		}
> 
> This should not fail normally, right? Since we pre-allocate the memory.
> Perhaps add a comment saying that?
> 
> > +
> >  		err = luo_file_freeze_one(file_set, luo_file);
> >  		if (err < 0) {
> >  			pr_warn("Freeze failed for token[%#0llx] handler[%s] err[%pe]\n",
> > @@ -514,16 +480,21 @@ int luo_file_freeze(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> >  			goto err_unfreeze;
> >  		}
> >  
> > -		strscpy(file_ser[i].compatible, luo_file->fh->compatible,
> > -			sizeof(file_ser[i].compatible));
> > -		file_ser[i].data = luo_file->serialized_data;
> > -		file_ser[i].token = luo_file->token;
> > -		i++;
> > +		strscpy(file_ser->compatible, luo_file->fh->compatible,
> > +			sizeof(file_ser->compatible));
> > +		file_ser->data = luo_file->serialized_data;
> > +		file_ser->token = luo_file->token;
> >  	}
> > +	kho_block_it_finalize(&it);
> >  
> >  	file_set_ser->count = file_set->count;
> > -	if (file_set->files)
> > -		file_set_ser->files = virt_to_phys(file_set->files);
> > +	if (!list_empty(&file_set->block_set.blocks)) {
> > +		struct kho_block *block;
> > +
> > +		block = list_first_entry(&file_set->block_set.blocks,
> > +					 struct kho_block, list);
> > +		file_set_ser->files = virt_to_phys(block->ser);
> > +	}
> 
> Please, add an API in KHO block to return the header physical address.
> Poking into the internals of the data structure like this is not a good
> idea.

SGTM

> 
> I missed that patch 9 also does this. So please use that there too.
> 
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > @@ -741,14 +712,12 @@ int luo_file_finish(struct luo_file_set *file_set)
> >  		module_put(luo_file->fh->ops->owner);
> >  		list_del(&luo_file->list);
> >  		file_set->count--;
> > +		kho_block_shrink(&file_set->block_set, file_set->count);
> >  		mutex_destroy(&luo_file->mutex);
> >  		kfree(luo_file);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (file_set->files) {
> > -		kho_restore_free(file_set->files);
> > -		file_set->files = NULL;
> > -	}
> > +	kho_block_destroy(&file_set->block_set);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -822,16 +791,18 @@ int luo_file_deserialize(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> >  			 struct luo_file_set_ser *file_set_ser)
> >  {
> >  	struct luo_file_ser *file_ser;
> > +	struct kho_block_it it;
> >  	int err;
> > -	u64 i;
> >  
> >  	if (!file_set_ser->files) {
> >  		WARN_ON(file_set_ser->count);
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	file_set->count = file_set_ser->count;
> > -	file_set->files = phys_to_virt(file_set_ser->files);
> > +	file_set->count = 0;
> > +	err = kho_block_restore(&file_set->block_set, file_set_ser->files);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Note on error handling:
> > @@ -848,25 +819,50 @@ int luo_file_deserialize(struct luo_file_set *file_set,
> >  	 * userspace to detect the failure and trigger a reboot, which will
> >  	 * reliably reset devices and reclaim memory.
> >  	 */
> > -	file_ser = file_set->files;
> > -	for (i = 0; i < file_set->count; i++) {
> > -		err = luo_file_deserialize_one(file_set, &file_ser[i]);
> > +	kho_block_it_init(&it, &file_set->block_set);
> > +	while ((file_ser = kho_block_it_read(&it))) {
> > +		err = luo_file_deserialize_one(file_set, file_ser);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_destroy_blocks;
> > +		file_set->count++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (file_set->count != file_set_ser->count) {
> > +		pr_warn("File count mismatch: expected %llu, found %llu\n",
> > +			file_set_ser->count, file_set->count);
> > +		err = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto err_destroy_blocks;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > +
> > +err_destroy_blocks:
> > +	while (!list_empty(&file_set->files_list)) {
> > +		struct luo_file *luo_file;
> > +
> > +		luo_file = list_first_entry(&file_set->files_list,
> > +					    struct luo_file, list);
> > +		list_del(&luo_file->list);
> > +		module_put(luo_file->fh->ops->owner);
> > +		mutex_destroy(&luo_file->mutex);
> > +		kfree(luo_file);
> > +	}
> > +	file_set->count = 0;
> > +	kho_block_destroy(&file_set->block_set);
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void luo_file_set_init(struct luo_file_set *file_set)
> >  {
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file_set->files_list);
> > +	kho_block_set_init(&file_set->block_set, sizeof(struct luo_file_ser));
> >  }
> >  
> >  void luo_file_set_destroy(struct luo_file_set *file_set)
> >  {
> >  	WARN_ON(file_set->count);
> >  	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&file_set->files_list));
> > +	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&file_set->block_set.blocks));
> 
> Here too.

Sure

> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h
> > index ee18f9a11b91..64879ffe7378 100644
> > --- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h
> > +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +#include <linux/kho_block.h>
> >  
> >  struct luo_ucmd {
> >  	void __user *ubuffer;
> > @@ -44,14 +45,13 @@ static inline int luo_ucmd_respond(struct luo_ucmd *ucmd,
> >   * struct luo_file_set - A set of files that belong to the same sessions.
> >   * @files_list: An ordered list of files associated with this session, it is
> >   *              ordered by preservation time.
> > - * @files:      The physically contiguous memory block that holds the serialized
> > - *              state of files.
> > + * @block_set:  The set of serialization blocks.
> >   * @count:      A counter tracking the number of files currently stored in the
> >   *              @files_list for this session.
> >   */
> >  struct luo_file_set {
> >  	struct list_head files_list;
> > -	struct luo_file_ser *files;
> > +	struct kho_block_set block_set;
> >  	u64 count;
> >  };
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-30 22:19 [PATCH v4 00/13] liveupdate: Remove limits on sessions and files Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] liveupdate: change file_set->count type to u64 for type safety Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-31 13:35   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 12:08   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] liveupdate: avoid mixing cleanup guards with goto in luo_session_retrieve_fd Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-31 12:52   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 12:15   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] liveupdate: centralize state management into struct luo_ser Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 12:19   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] liveupdate: register luo_ser as KHO subtree Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-31 13:44   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 12:39   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-01 13:50     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 14:27       ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] liveupdate: Extract luo_file_deserialize_one helper Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] liveupdate: Extract luo_session_deserialize_one helper Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] kho: add support for linked-block serialization Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 13:38   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-01 14:37     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] liveupdate: defer session block allocation and PA setting Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 13:47   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of sessions Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 14:03   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-01 14:44     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of files per session Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 14:16   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-01 14:40     ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 14:17   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-sessions kexec test Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-01 14:19   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-30 22:19 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-files " Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ah2Z0R9uI7bNaUi5@google.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox