From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org,
peterx@redhat.com, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jthoughton@google.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, sj@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] selftests/mm: add userfaultfd RWP tests
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 16:43:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahRtlPsrj31R-rek@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525123904.0A31F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 12:39:03PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Hardcoding _UFFDIO_SET_MODE in the unconditionally checked
> expected_ioctls breaks the userfaultfd selftests on older kernels.
Will be fixed in v5 -- dropped _UFFDIO_SET_MODE from expected_ioctls in
test_uffd_api(). The dedicated RWP tests already exercise the ioctl
directly and err if it's not supported, so SET_MODE coverage isn't lost.
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260525113737.1942478-1-kas@kernel.org?part=13
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20260525123904.0A31F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahRtlPsrj31R-rek@thinkstation \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox