From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5854C3A6B7F; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 09:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782983757; cv=none; b=a5fwPDu+S7FbgwbT9G8H8UHE68IFJVU3Q/ZYI9+gYBwFdbQXFICwgB64PXO7BYG+s9RJznwG3mIbhl5FMP9KlrVaHN2Ev40Y1HPlRGjXEI16YR+mH1eawrTzM7fPJGHTAPIaKICEP9N+YdmFGcvNn3f2CpNdakQgsxsqTRraDYw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782983757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MnM5Is1Jb3E8Tt3TumhPu3e7wva41E/sp/tlrTvBIUs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CdECRRmqn0Rrg6WCcvYT00jo0xW0ffNziGjTwevJu3IvHI+gmWlPAeAVNAB5ceIfBezMpkfwQUCfFGelkyUAkzHZkLgCIkLXYiK47zXSSE8jN75QFLhM0Zvoy6wN6yUSTnNLMVKo2vnPso58/ZXjlc06U53VxzB5Jco7Q3hZ/5U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=eT0p3qPv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="eT0p3qPv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782983755; x=1814519755; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MnM5Is1Jb3E8Tt3TumhPu3e7wva41E/sp/tlrTvBIUs=; b=eT0p3qPv4n4/hLZCYGARurq/mPHZWFSWt9xA73dUHRe+EbGXFMI5Jj3m QklwK1A5MA23H8TwowZ3GZNsafJpWNqVZ6ulbxfS3LLKZP4/p7Bp4VDw6 djWAvXriU94aFGTpjKHsJ/m6NwUqmQF4VmsoFBS33TOOuQ84LDHY+QCyq bR632mkDln3N4/vEXPliBxRttd3FwlWh1aKoJd6wbskDRlgZ2v5/Q48OA NpHQdz//jIQX210IwIDuM0703IDmNXn0WdYa5oMxBX5aaOA43zgdYezR+ DTGrXy2I4D6AyZm+Q2klLpaKXtsu2iy6gw1w/frlfi4NvqjYVszeSJFSc A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dIDzq1BGQDiZKOcYxnsN4A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: v1lC76I6Q2OR8Ic+OuRP8Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11834"; a="83863157" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,143,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="83863157" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2026 02:15:54 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qsRMGnTPTImeK28S5z2IdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RGgk0Xd2SMeV8wOFW+2zjA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,143,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="257149632" Received: from ettammin-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.213]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2026 02:15:52 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 12:15:50 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" Cc: Linux ACPI , Danilo Krummrich , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hans de Goede , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , LKML , Linux Documentation , driver-core@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: bus: Remove struct acpi_driver from the kernel Message-ID: References: <6027395.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6027395.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 09:15:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote: > Hi All, > > After converting all of the drivers using the struct acpi_driver interface to > proper platform drivers, that interface can be dropped now, which is done in > this series (patch [1/2]). What a nice result! > Additionally, the no_pm flag is set for all struct acpi_device object since > they are not going to be directly involved in any kind of power management > now (that is, they will not have PM-aware drivers and they will not be > included in PM domains). I am in favour of this cleanup! Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko