From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta1.migadu.com (out-179.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102473C0A1B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784053076; cv=none; b=nnEgrTnD1aH9dHhT9ffNoRROI8aYr1UI9YMChgVusjuv5/1TZYmBrZ6Yl5KfxAVemyOyXU/HkBVEUNzn8aAcZaTBIv4taMIO4qyTnZSqF3+m5/JPxlS8Nt1XOhZc8WIc6SLPvXsZw24fjREmEB24lU7ijbt6Er6ndWfoH7UoFjE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784053076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8uFUMG/y2FQTaI9putOGxq/IhR2RVTiqiesqfrLcMGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=o5iLRkaI5Pj7mw+Hv78LKy69Tt1cQ9+kPr98a1lX5dE8x5W2a5as8BHjQ8swr1f/hN6dP7Zdf3P+WvfZQwyk9nsSmtVNeI3YIinJmSl3CIv0GCPqHoTVbDrQBfQbr2gQEzdXOjXbuKEsBT9RatSZrMKkvb5vqB1izfZalFeL0tA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b=ucs+gwSx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.b="ucs+gwSx" Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:17:34 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wyuan.org; s=key1; t=1784053072; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BKFMkgqosyViKcB2x507n7iQ8e5UUkuAaHVddycnM9U=; b=ucs+gwSxAm2JZ7kWG81MlBd0Le0bGfXZruKsak1nxH9AOIB9kpbDaM6oaJhfeW1c3Z148v ob3LkWDapbaw6mEuHwHm683+K/iH31lQuJOLS8ubj5AC+dUWLg2X6/qNF4utjMCPK9e0iL grd95xkdgmm4YLohkMTp2HMLqSyVwASRTdlrdH7oL4Ql0JcVgkgQWZp/P7zqLhWkOsuEBp Y1aCv34WADxCTbGiKC9MrExyBn8EglJuI4XF0mLwH7/+e0cle7NIC+gYuMl12ruKs4oIti GUz1duR6eEdhbYtdtR1HRjy/YXf7SomUyxrgPCWrBGlicCZpCMqDugSSGySo8w== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Weijie Yuan To: Doehyun Baek Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Dongliang Mu , Ben Guo , Gary Guo , Yan Zhu , Jiandong Qiu , chengyaqiang , Haoyang Liu Subject: Re: What's cooking in zh_CN (Jul 2026, #02) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 07:56:28PM +0200, Doehyun Baek wrote: > > Btw, for example, my patch (Weijie Yuan · docs/zh_CN: add docs-next > > checkout workaround) is actually directly discarded after we reached > > a consensus during our communication (with Dongliang). But it's > > obvious that we didn't say it explicitly. So your website can't > > recognize it automaticly right now. Perhaps we can think about how > > to deal with this situation later. > > Yeah, this is a downside of an automated approach: it can miss details > that are only implicit in the discussion. I see roughly three ways to > handle such cases: > > 1. Allow authors to mark a patch explicitly by replying with a > recognized phrase, such as `Patch-status: withdrawn`. > 2. Use natural-language reasoning, perhaps with an LLM, to infer the > outcome from the discussion. I leaned against it due to cost and > complexity. > 3. Leave the patch pending and let it move to "Cold" automatically > after 30 days. Junio originally uses "Stalled", but I don't think there's a difference though :-) > I think either the first or the third option makes sense in this situation. Agreed.