Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Zhigang.Luo@amd.com, arun.george@samsung.com,
	 balbirs@nvidia.com, brendan.jackman@linux.dev,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com,  apopple@nvidia.com, alucerop@amd.com,
	matthew.brost@intel.com,  akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
	 vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com,  corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,  rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org,
	djbw@kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,  dave.jiang@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, osandov@osandov.com,
	 jannh@google.com, pfalcato@suse.de, jackmanb@google.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org,  ziy@nvidia.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	osalvador@suse.de, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,  rakie.kim@sk.com,
	byungchul@sk.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
	 kasong@tencent.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	baohua@kernel.org,  axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
	weixugc@google.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	 linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, longman@redhat.com,
	ridong.chen@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,  mkoutny@suse.com,
	sj@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	 peterx@redhat.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	npache@redhat.com,  ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev,  xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
	chengming.zhou@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	 muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,  driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 26/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM for opted-in private node reclaim
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:36:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amDGXU94trqlXUgR@MWDK4CY14F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720193431.3841992-27-gourry@gourry.net>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 03:34:20PM +0800, Gregory Price wrote:
> Provide a mechanism to opt private nodes into the reclaim process.
> 
> Reclaim as a "singular service" is actually made up of:
> 
>    - kswapd reclaim
>    - direct reclaim
>    - kcompactd compaction
>    - direct compaction
>    - both mglru / lru paths
>    - madvise reclaim hints
>    - damon reclaim operations
> 
> CAP_RECLAIM gates whether the kernel may do inter-node placement
> (compaction) or swap for the folios on that private node.
> 
> node_allows_reclaim() encapsulates the policy as a whole.  Ordinary
> nodes are always reclaimable, private nodes only when opted in.
> 
> With the exception of madvise and DAMON, reclaim operations are
> highly integrated with one another, so they are opted in/out of
> together - otherwise reclaim becomes unpredictable.
> 
> To prevent bisect debugging failures, this stays in a single commit.
> 
> For example: reclaim without compaction will OOM on high-order
> allocation failure despite a large amount of free memory. Normally
> compaction would (potentially) resolve this issue.
> 
> If a private node opts into reclaim, we create normal watermarks for
> that node - otherwise pgdat_balanced() is always true and reclaim
> thinks there is no work to do.
> 
> Cross-node operations (demotion, promotion, khugepaged) are NOT
> included in CAP_RECLAIM because some workflows may desire different
> behaviors for this kind of operation:
> 
>    - prefer direct-to-swap, do not demote
>    - remain resident and OOM
>    - __GFP_THISNODE: fail and let the driver augment reclaim
> 
> Normal swap-out is allowed because there are clear userland controls
> (not registering swap, cgroup.swap, etc) to control that per-workload.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> ---
>  include/linux/node_private.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/compaction.c              |  9 ++++---
>  mm/damon/paddr.c             |  4 +--
>  mm/huge_memory.c             |  2 +-
>  mm/internal.h                | 13 ++++++++++
>  mm/madvise.c                 |  6 ++---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c          |  3 +--
>  mm/page_alloc.c              |  2 +-
>  mm/vmscan.c                  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  9 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/node_private.h b/include/linux/node_private.h
> index 475496c84249f..f7cbae1309904 100644
> --- a/include/linux/node_private.h
> +++ b/include/linux/node_private.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
>  
>  struct page;
>  
> +/*
> + * Per-node service opt-ins (node_private.caps).  A private node is isolated
> + * from all general mm services by default; the registering driver sets these
> + * to let specific services operate on its node.
> + */
> +#define NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM	(1UL << 0)	/* allow mm reclaim */
> +
>  /**
>   * struct node_private - Per-node container for N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes
>   *
> @@ -41,6 +48,27 @@ static inline bool node_is_private(int nid)
>  	return node_state(nid, N_MEMORY_PRIVATE);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * node_allows_reclaim - may the mm reclaim from this node?
> + * @nid: the node to test
> + *
> + * Only a private node is ever excluded.  Every other node can safely
> + * be operated on by reclaim.
> + */
> +static inline bool node_allows_reclaim(int nid)
> +{
> +	struct node_private *np;
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY_PRIVATE))
> +		return true;
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	np = rcu_dereference(NODE_DATA(nid)->node_private);
> +	ret = np && (np->caps & NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
>  
>  static inline bool folio_is_private_node(struct folio *folio)
> @@ -58,6 +86,11 @@ static inline bool node_is_private(int nid)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool node_allows_reclaim(int nid)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 8c1351cce7bcc..b9c25c599732f 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/psi.h>
>  #include <linux/cpuset.h>
>  #include "page_alloc.h"
> +#include <linux/node_private.h>
>  #include "internal.h"
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
> @@ -2462,7 +2463,7 @@ bool compaction_zonelist_suitable(struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
>  		    !__cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, gfp_mask))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (node_is_private(zone_to_nid(zone)))
> +		if (!node_allows_reclaim(zone_to_nid(zone)))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -2856,7 +2857,7 @@ enum compact_result try_to_compact_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  			!__cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, gfp_mask))
>  				continue;
>  
> -		if (node_is_private(zone_to_nid(zone)))
> +		if (!node_allows_reclaim(zone_to_nid(zone)))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (prio > MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY
> @@ -2928,7 +2929,7 @@ static int compact_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, bool proactive)
>  		.proactive_compaction = proactive,
>  	};
>  
> -	if (node_is_private(pgdat->node_id))
> +	if (!node_allows_reclaim(pgdat->node_id))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	for (zoneid = 0; zoneid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zoneid++) {
> @@ -3026,7 +3027,7 @@ static ssize_t compact_store(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	int nid = dev->id;
>  
> -	if (node_is_private(nid))
> +	if (!node_allows_reclaim(nid))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (nid >= 0 && nid < nr_node_ids && node_online(nid)) {
> diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> index c741a94319750..b668cf55d1b67 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static unsigned long damon_pa_pageout(struct damon_region *r,
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		/* private node memory is not reclaimable by default */
> -		if (folio_is_private_node(folio))
> +		/* DAMOS pageout is reclaim; gate a private node on CAP_RECLAIM */
> +		if (!node_allows_reclaim(folio_nid(folio)))
>  			goto put_folio;
>  
>  		if (damos_pa_filter_out(s, folio))
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 1df91b4e5c2bc..cebc89eb0541f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  	folio = pmd_folio(orig_pmd);
>  
> -	if (folio_is_private_node(folio))
> +	if (!node_allows_reclaim(folio_nid(folio)))
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 85c460296cea1..8329034ae561f 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,19 @@ static inline bool page_is_private_managed(struct page *page)
>  	return folio_is_private_managed(page_folio(page));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * folio_allows_madvise() - may madvise reclaim hints act on this folio?
> + *
> + * madvise reclaim hints (COLD/PAGEOUT/FREE) are userland-driven reclaim, so
> + * they follow reclaim opt-in: false for ZONE_DEVICE and for N_MEMORY_PRIVATE
> + * nodes without CAP_RECLAIM, true for all other normal folios.
> + */
> +static inline bool folio_allows_madvise(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	return !folio_is_zone_device(folio) &&
> +	       node_allows_reclaim(folio_nid(folio));
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * folio_allows_longterm_pin() - may this folio be long-term GUP-pinned?
>   *
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 29f35a23919a0..56ca974542707 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>  
>  		folio = pmd_folio(orig_pmd);
>  
> -		if (folio_is_private_node(folio))
> +		if (!node_allows_reclaim(folio_nid(folio)))
>  			goto huge_unlock;
>  
>  		/* Do not interfere with other mappings of this folio */
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, ptent);
> -		if (!folio || folio_is_private_managed(folio))
> +		if (!folio || !folio_allows_madvise(folio))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  		}
>  
>  		folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, ptent);
> -		if (!folio || folio_is_private_managed(folio))
> +		if (!folio || !folio_allows_madvise(folio))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/*
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index be230ac9efe5a..1f42ed303366c 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1237,8 +1237,7 @@ int online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	/* reinitialise watermarks and update pcp limits */
>  	init_per_zone_wmark_min();
>  
> -	/* Private nodes opt-out of reclaim/compaction by default */
> -	if (!node_is_private(nid)) {
> +	if (node_allows_reclaim(nid)) {
>  		kswapd_run(nid);
>  		kcompactd_run(nid);
>  	}
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 2b08bea2379a9..2667a4564b7ac 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -6667,7 +6667,7 @@ static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
>  		u64 tmp;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> -		if (node_is_private(zone_to_nid(zone))) {
> +		if (!node_allows_reclaim(zone_to_nid(zone))) {
>  			zone->_watermark[WMARK_MIN] = 0;
>  			zone->_watermark[WMARK_LOW] = 0;
>  			zone->_watermark[WMARK_HIGH] = 0;
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 86b2334c23b98..f1722693ac2db 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -5396,6 +5396,21 @@ static const struct attribute_group lru_gen_attr_group = {
>   *                          debugfs interface
>   ******************************************************************************/
>  
> +/*
> + * Nodes the lru_gen debugfs interface lists: ordinary memory nodes plus any
> + * N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes opted into reclaim.  run_cmd() already accepts the
> + * latter, so keep the listing in sync with what it accepts.
> + */
> +static void lru_gen_seq_nodes(nodemask_t *nodes)
> +{
> +	int nid;
> +
> +	*nodes = node_states[N_MEMORY];
> +	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY_PRIVATE)
> +		if (node_allows_reclaim(nid))
> +			node_set(nid, *nodes);
> +}
> +
>  static void *lru_gen_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> @@ -5407,9 +5422,11 @@ static void *lru_gen_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  
>  	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
>  	do {
> +		nodemask_t nodes;
>  		int nid;
>  
> -		for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
> +		lru_gen_seq_nodes(&nodes);
> +		for_each_node_mask(nid, nodes) {
>  			if (!nr_to_skip--)
>  				return get_lruvec(memcg, nid);
>  		}
> @@ -5431,16 +5448,18 @@ static void *lru_gen_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  {
>  	int nid = lruvec_pgdat(v)->node_id;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(v);
> +	nodemask_t nodes;
>  
>  	++*pos;
>  
> -	nid = next_memory_node(nid);
> +	lru_gen_seq_nodes(&nodes);
> +	nid = next_node(nid, nodes);
>  	if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES) {
>  		memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL);
>  		if (!memcg)
>  			return NULL;
>  
> -		nid = first_memory_node;
> +		nid = first_node(nodes);
>  	}
>  
>  	return get_lruvec(memcg, nid);
> @@ -5509,10 +5528,12 @@ static int lru_gen_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  	struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
>  	int nid = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_id;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
> +	nodemask_t nodes;
>  	DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
>  	DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
>  
> -	if (nid == first_memory_node) {
> +	lru_gen_seq_nodes(&nodes);
> +	if (nid == first_node(nodes)) {
>  		const char *path = memcg ? m->private : "";
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> @@ -5612,7 +5633,9 @@ static int run_cmd(char cmd, u64 memcg_id, int nid, unsigned long seq,
>  	int err = -EINVAL;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
>  
> -	if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_state(nid, N_MEMORY))
> +	if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES ||
> +	    !(node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) ||
> +	      (node_is_private(nid) && node_allows_reclaim(nid))))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!mem_cgroup_disabled()) {
> @@ -6145,7 +6168,7 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>  	 * Private nodes do not support reclaim by default, filtering here
>  	 * captures all normal reclaim paths that may attempt eviction.
>  	 */
> -	if (node_is_private(pgdat->node_id))
> +	if (!node_allows_reclaim(pgdat->node_id))
>  		return;
>  
>  	if ((lru_gen_enabled() || lru_gen_switching()) && root_reclaim(sc)) {
> @@ -6758,6 +6781,16 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	return sc.nr_reclaimed;
>  }
>  
> +static struct zonelist *memcg_reclaim_zonelist(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> +	unsigned int aflags = ALLOC_DEFAULT;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!nodes_empty(node_states[N_MEMORY_PRIVATE])))
> +		aflags = ALLOC_ZONELIST_PRIVATE;
> +
> +	return select_zonelist(nid, gfp_mask, aflags);
> +}


I applied this code change and notice in mem_cgroup_shrink_node(), it calls
shrink_lruvec() directly and never passes through shrink_node().

This patch makes private nodes reachable through memcg reclaim zonelist, but
what prevents the direct per-node memcg path from reclaiming a private node
that has not set NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM ?

--Richard


> +
>  unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  					   unsigned long nr_pages,
>  					   gfp_t gfp_mask,
> @@ -6784,7 +6817,8 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	 * equal pressure on all the nodes. This is based on the assumption that
>  	 * the reclaim does not bail out early.
>  	 */
> -	struct zonelist *zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), sc.gfp_mask);
> +	struct zonelist *zonelist = memcg_reclaim_zonelist(numa_node_id(),
> +							   sc.gfp_mask);
>  
>  	set_task_reclaim_state(current, &sc.reclaim_state);
>  	trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(sc.gfp_mask, 0, memcg);
> -- 
> 2.53.0-Meta
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 19:33 [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/36] mm: refactor find_next_best_node to find_next_best_node_in Gregory Price
2026-07-21  5:46   ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/36] mm/page_alloc: refactor build_node_zonelist() out of build_zonelists() Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/36] mm/page_alloc: let the bulk and folio allocators carry alloc_flags Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/36] numa: introduce N_MEMORY_PRIVATE Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/36] mm: add ZONELIST_PRIVATE(_NOFALLBACK) for N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-22 13:00   ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 13:19     ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 06/36] cpuset: exclude private nodes from cpuset.mems (default-open) Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 07/36] mm/memory_hotplug: disallow migration-driven private node hotunplug Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 08/36] mm/mempolicy: skip private node folios when queueing for migration Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 09/36] mm/migrate: disallow userland driven migration for private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 10/36] mm/madvise: disallow madvise operations on private node folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 11/36] mm/compaction: disallow compaction on private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 12/36] mm/page_alloc: clear private node watermarks and system reserves Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 13/36] mm/mempolicy: disallow NUMA Balancing prot_none on private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 14/36] mm/damon: skip private node memory in DAMON migration and pageout Gregory Price
2026-07-21 23:46   ` SJ Park
2026-07-22 12:16     ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 15/36] mm/ksm: skip KSM for managed-memory folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 16/36] mm/khugepaged: skip private node folios when trying to collapse Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 17/36] mm/vmscan: disallow reclaim of private node memory Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 18/36] mm/gup: disallow longterm pin of private node folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 19/36] proc: include N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes in numa_maps output Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 20/36] mm/memcontrol: account private-node memory in per-node stats Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 21/36] proc/kcore: include private-node RAM in the kcore RAM map Gregory Price
2026-07-20 20:05   ` Omar Sandoval
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 22/36] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_F_PRIVATE and zonelist selection Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 23/36] mm/mempolicy: apply policy at the kernel zone for private-node binds Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 24/36] mm/mempolicy: add in-kernel MPOL_BIND interfaces for drivers/services Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 25/36] mm/memory_hotplug: support N_MEMORY_PRIVATE node hotplug Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 26/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM for opted-in private node reclaim Gregory Price
2026-07-22 13:36   ` Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-07-22 13:48     ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 27/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_USER_NUMA for userland numa controls Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 28/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_HOTUNPLUG for opted-in private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-22 14:04   ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 29/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_DEMOTION for private-node tiering demotion Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 30/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_NUMA_BALANCING for private-node NUMA balancing Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 31/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_LTPIN for private node folio pinning Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 32/36] mm/khugepaged: base private node collapse eligiblity on actor/cap bits Gregory Price
2026-07-22 13:24   ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 13:43     ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 33/36] Documentation/mm: describe private (N_MEMORY_PRIVATE) memory nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 34/36] mm/mempolicy: add mpol_set_shared_policy_range() Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 35/36] KVM: guest_memfd: bind backing memory to a NUMA node at creation Gregory Price
2026-07-21  3:46 ` [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes Balbir Singh
2026-07-21 18:16   ` Gregory Price
2026-07-22  8:29     ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-22 12:28       ` Gregory Price
2026-07-21 13:26 ` Zenghui Yu
2026-07-21 17:18   ` Gregory Price
2026-07-22 14:20 ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 15:40   ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amDGXU94trqlXUgR@MWDK4CY14F \
    --to=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Zhigang.Luo@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox